Tsui v. Chow
Associate Judge Bilawich held that on the interim record the respondent's resignation and relocation without securing alternative employment was unreasonable and coupled with his failure to produce income tax returns justified imputing his Guideline income at $420,000 (based on his last disclosed Hong Kong income) for interim support purposes; accordingly interim child support of $3,500/month (from Jan 1, 2025) and interim spousal support of $11,200/month (from Aug 1, 2024) were ordered, s.7 expenses were ordered 100% payable by respondent, the respondent's shared-parenting application was dismissed as premature given unsettled living arrangements and child's maturity, sale of the HK...
- Citation
- 2025 BCSC 14
- Parties
- Claimant: Ching Tsui; Respondent: Stephen Marcellus Chow
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Interim Applications / Hearing on Interim Applications and Document Production (nov 28 29, 2024); Decision on Interim Relief and Directions Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Interim relief granted in part and denied in part: respondent's shared parenting and sale of North Van dismissed; respondent's HK property sale permitted under conditions; respondent's guideline income imputed and interim child and spousal support ordered; broad financial disclosure ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Support, Imputation of Income, Tax Gross Up for Non Resident Income, Parenting Arrangements and Best Interests, Section 7 Special Expenses, Sale of Matrimonial Property, Document Production and Discovery, Hague Convention Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ching Tsui
Claimant
Stephen Marcellus Chow
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Interim Applications / Hearing on Interim Applications and Document Production (nov 28 29, 2024); Decision on Interim Relief and Directions Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim child support and spousal support should be ordered and in what amounts
- 2 Whether respondent's foreign income should be imputed/grossed up for Guidelines purposes
- 3 Whether shared 50/50 parenting should be ordered pending respondent's relocation
Ratio Decidendi
Associate Judge Bilawich held that on the interim record the respondent's resignation and relocation without securing alternative employment was unreasonable and coupled with his failure to produce income tax returns justified imputing his Guideline income at $420,000 (based on his last disclosed Hong Kong income) for interim support purposes; accordingly interim child support of $3,500/month (from Jan 1, 2025) and interim spousal support of $11,200/month (from Aug 1, 2024) were ordered, s.7 expenses were ordered 100% payable by respondent, the respondent's shared-parenting application was dismissed as premature given unsettled living arrangements and child's maturity, sale of the HK...
Court Disposition
Interim relief granted in part and denied in part: respondent's shared parenting and sale of North Van dismissed; respondent's HK property sale permitted under conditions; respondent's guideline income imputed and interim child and spousal support ordered; broad financial disclosure ordered.
Orders
- Parties to continue as joint guardians and both exercise s.41 FLA parenting responsibilities (by consent)
- Respondent's application for interim shared parenting (week-on/week-off) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment