Gertner v. Gold

Gertner v. Gold

The appeal was dismissed as abandoned because the appellant failed to appear at the scheduled hearing despite knowing he was to be present and not opposing counsel's application to remove him from the record; costs were fixed to the respondents.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2010 ONCA 132
Parties
Applicant: Stoyka Todorova Georgieva; Respondent: Phil Gold; Respondent: Renee Gold; Appellant: Henry Josef Gertner
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Hearing/endorsement; Appellant Failed to Appear
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as abandoned
Legal Topics
Abandonment of Appeal, Costs, Failure to Appear, Removal From Record
Source Language
en
Civil Appeal Procedural Law Abandonment of Appeal Costs Failure to Appear Removal From Record

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stoyka Todorova Georgieva

Applicant

Phil Gold

Respondent

Renee Gold

Respondent

Henry Josef Gertner

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Hearing/endorsement; Appellant Failed to Appear

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed as abandoned because the appellant failed to appear
  2. 2 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondents and the appropriate quantum

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as abandoned because the appellant failed to appear at the scheduled hearing despite knowing he was to be present and not opposing counsel's application to remove him from the record; costs were fixed to the respondents.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as abandoned

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed as abandoned.
  • Costs to the respondents fixed at $1,500 inclusive of G.S.T. and disbursements.