Meyburgh (Bankruptcy of)
Master Bolton held that s.155(e) authorizes trustees in summary administration estates to repay overpayments without inspectors' permission or court order where no inspectors are appointed, but s.152(1) requires the trustee's final statement to disclose and itemize total receipts and any refunds; trustees must amend statements to show amounts received and refunded; in Mantler the court could not determine substantive correctness of the refund but found no procedural impropriety regarding permission.
- Citation
- 2000 BCSC 693
- Parties
- Bankrupt: Albert Phillip Meyburgh; Bankrupt: James Carl Mantler; Trustee (meyburgh): D. Gurney; Trustee (mantler): D.G. Orrell; Regulator/objector: Superintendent of Bankruptcy; Judge/registrar: Master Bolton
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy (summary Administration) / Trustee Final Statement Taxation / Directions Application
- Outcome
- Superintendent's objection to non-disclosure sustained; trustees authorized to repay under s.155(e) where no inspectors; trustees ordered to amend/clarify statements; no costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Administration, Trustee Powers, Superintendent Directives, Statements of Receipts and Disbursements, Refunds to Bankrupts, Inspector Permission
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Albert Phillip Meyburgh
Bankrupt
James Carl Mantler
Bankrupt
D. Gurney
Trustee (meyburgh)
D.G. Orrell
Trustee (mantler)
Superintendent of Bankruptcy
Regulator/objector
Master Bolton
Judge/registrar
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (summary Administration) / Trustee Final Statement Taxation / Directions Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a trustee in a summary administration estate may repay overpayments to a bankrupt without inspectors' permission or court order
- 2 Whether the trustee's final statement of receipts and disbursements must disclose overpayments and refunds
- 3 Whether Form 13 permits reporting only net receipts without itemization
Ratio Decidendi
Master Bolton held that s.155(e) authorizes trustees in summary administration estates to repay overpayments without inspectors' permission or court order where no inspectors are appointed, but s.152(1) requires the trustee's final statement to disclose and itemize total receipts and any refunds; trustees must amend statements to show amounts received and refunded; in Mantler the court could not determine substantive correctness of the refund but found no procedural impropriety regarding permission.
Court Disposition
Superintendent's objection to non-disclosure sustained; trustees authorized to repay under s.155(e) where no inspectors; trustees ordered to amend/clarify statements; no costs ordered.
Orders
- Trustee of the Meyburgh estate shall submit an amended statement of receipts and disbursements itemizing total received from the bankrupt and the amount refunded and explaining the reason for the refund.
- Trustee of the Mantler estate shall submit a statement of receipts and disbursements itemizing total received from the bankrupt and the amount refunded in a form similar to that ordered in Meyburgh.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment