Tran v. Le
The deposition transcript was too uncertain, confused, and equivocal to establish the absolute defence of truth without weighing evidence; because the summary judge effectively weighed that transcript and found no triable issue, the judge erred and the appeal is allowed, with the matter remitted for further proceedings.
- Citation
- 2017 BCCA 222
- Parties
- Appellant (plaintiff): Alyssa Mai Phuong Tran; Respondent (defendant): Hai Van Le
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Appeal From Summary Judgment (rule 9 6)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order below set aside; matter remitted to the Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Absolute Defence of Truth, Deposition Evidence, Admissibility, Triable Issue
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alyssa Mai Phuong Tran
Appellant (plaintiff)
Hai Van Le
Respondent (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Appeal From Summary Judgment (rule 9 6)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment was appropriate under Rule 9-6
- 2 Whether the deposition transcript established the absolute defence of truth without weighing the evidence
- 3 Whether the deposition transcript was admissible and sufficiently reliable
Ratio Decidendi
The deposition transcript was too uncertain, confused, and equivocal to establish the absolute defence of truth without weighing evidence; because the summary judge effectively weighed that transcript and found no triable issue, the judge erred and the appeal is allowed, with the matter remitted for further proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order below set aside; matter remitted to the Supreme Court of British Columbia
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Order of summary judgment set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment