Del Ridge Construction Inc. v. The General Accident Assurance Company of Canada
The motion judge erred by resolving disputed factual and legal issues on a summary judgment motion; because the record showed genuine issues for trial and the pleadings and discoveries were complete, the proper remedy was to set aside the motion judge's order and remit all issues to a single trial judge for determination.
- Citation
- C39914, C41583
- Parties
- Plaintiff (respondent; Appellant by Way of Cross Appeal): Del Ridge Construction Inc.; Defendant (appellant; Respondent by Way of Cross Appeal): The General Accident Assurance Company of Canada; Defendant (appellant; Respondent by Way of Cross Appeal): Trinity Anglican Church; Defendant (appellant; Respondent by Way of Cross Appeal): Intra Architects Inc.
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (collection) / Appeal From Motion Judge Order on Summary Judgment; Remitted to Trial
- Outcome
- Order of the motion judge set aside; all issues to be tried by a trial judge; no costs of the appeal; costs of the motion to be determined by the trial judge.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Withdrawal of Consultant's Certificate, Termination by Frustration, Insurance Coverage for Construction Loss, Quantum Determination, Procedural Finality
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Del Ridge Construction Inc.
Plaintiff (respondent; Appellant by Way of Cross Appeal)
The General Accident Assurance Company of Canada
Defendant (appellant; Respondent by Way of Cross Appeal)
Trinity Anglican Church
Defendant (appellant; Respondent by Way of Cross Appeal)
Intra Architects Inc.
Defendant (appellant; Respondent by Way of Cross Appeal)
Procedural Posture
Civil (collection) / Appeal From Motion Judge Order on Summary Judgment; Remitted to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consultant was entitled to withdraw the certificate after issuing it and being served with the Statement of Claim
- 2 Whether the motion judge erred by deciding all disputed issues on a summary judgment motion instead of sending genuine issues to trial
- 3 Whether the insurer was liable under the contractor's policy given the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The motion judge erred by resolving disputed factual and legal issues on a summary judgment motion; because the record showed genuine issues for trial and the pleadings and discoveries were complete, the proper remedy was to set aside the motion judge's order and remit all issues to a single trial judge for determination.
Court Disposition
Order of the motion judge set aside; all issues to be tried by a trial judge; no costs of the appeal; costs of the motion to be determined by the trial judge.
Orders
- Order of the motion judge set aside in its entirety
- All issues in the action remitted for trial to one trial judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment