Levy v. Nelbar Financial Corporation
The guilty plea and related factual admissions established that the appellant's fraudulent conduct caused the losses and supported class-wide liability; the damages were adequately assessed by reference and approved; therefore there was no genuine issue for trial and summary judgment was properly entered and upheld on appeal.
- Citation
- C44424
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Percy Levy; Defendant/appellant: Nelbar Financial Corporation; Defendant/appellant: Essex Capital Management Ltd.; Defendant/appellant: George Nelson Allen; Defendant/appellant: Robin Moriarty; Defendant/appellant: Barbara Allen; Defendant/appellant: Woodbine Driving Range Limited (formerly 884085 Ontario Limited); Defendant/appellant: 1272327 Ontario Inc.; Defendant/appellant: Nelson Allen Financial Corporation; Defendant/appellant: Kukoke Holdings Inc.
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Court of Appeal Appeal From Summary Judgment of Superior Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; summary judgment of the Superior Court upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Guilty Plea Admissions, Causation, Damages Assessment by Reference, Receivership, Class Wide Liability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Percy Levy
Plaintiff/respondent
Nelbar Financial Corporation
Defendant/appellant
Essex Capital Management Ltd.
Defendant/appellant
George Nelson Allen
Defendant/appellant
Robin Moriarty
Defendant/appellant
Barbara Allen
Defendant/appellant
Woodbine Driving Range Limited (formerly 884085 Ontario Limited)
Defendant/appellant
1272327 Ontario Inc.
Defendant/appellant
Nelson Allen Financial Corporation
Defendant/appellant
Kukoke Holdings Inc.
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Court of Appeal Appeal From Summary Judgment of Superior Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a genuine issue for trial as to the cause of the loss
- 2 Whether the appellant's guilty plea admissions support class-wide liability
- 3 Whether damages were adequately assessed by reference to support summary judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The guilty plea and related factual admissions established that the appellant's fraudulent conduct caused the losses and supported class-wide liability; the damages were adequately assessed by reference and approved; therefore there was no genuine issue for trial and summary judgment was properly entered and upheld on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; summary judgment of the Superior Court upheld.
Orders
- Summary judgment against the appellant for $10,610,807.94 to the persons listed in Master Linton's Interim Reports #1 and #2, plus post-judgment interest and $3,500.00 for costs of the motion
- Costs to the respondent in the amount of $14,500.00 inclusive of disbursements and GST
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment