Vandergiessen v. Trillium Health Centre (Mississauga)
The motion judge erred in granting summary judgment solely because the appellant lacked expert opinion; allegations that statutory procedures and conditions for involuntary committal and Charter breaches occurred can be triable issues that do not necessarily require expert evidence, and the respondents failed to show there was no triable issue.
- Citation
- 2010 ONCA 379
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Yvonne Vandergiessen; Respondent/defendant: Mississauga Hospital; Respondent/defendant: Dr. K. McIntyre; Respondent/defendant: Dr. M.A. Virey; Respondent/defendant: Peel Police Services Board; Respondent/defendant: Halton Police Services Board; Respondent/defendant: Officer Joan Wilson - Badge No 1908; Respondent/defendant: Officer N. Sachdeva - Badge No 1940; Respondent/defendant: Security Guard Wes Cheshire - Badge No 20633; Respondent/defendant: Security Guard Mark Borba - Badge No 20531; Respondent/defendant: Carecor Health Services Limited
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; summary judgment set aside
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Standard of Care, Involuntary Committal, Expert Evidence, Statutory Procedure, Charter Breach
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yvonne Vandergiessen
Appellant/plaintiff
Mississauga Hospital
Respondent/defendant
Dr. K. McIntyre
Respondent/defendant
Dr. M.A. Virey
Respondent/defendant
Peel Police Services Board
Respondent/defendant
Halton Police Services Board
Respondent/defendant
Officer Joan Wilson - Badge No 1908
Respondent/defendant
Officer N. Sachdeva - Badge No 1940
Respondent/defendant
Security Guard Wes Cheshire - Badge No 20633
Respondent/defendant
Security Guard Mark Borba - Badge No 20531
Respondent/defendant
Carecor Health Services Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the motion judge properly granted summary judgment based solely on absence of expert opinion
- 2 Whether claims alleging failure to follow statutory procedures and conditions for involuntary committal can be established without expert evidence
- 3 Whether respondents discharged their burden on summary judgment to show there was no triable issue
Ratio Decidendi
The motion judge erred in granting summary judgment solely because the appellant lacked expert opinion; allegations that statutory procedures and conditions for involuntary committal and Charter breaches occurred can be triable issues that do not necessarily require expert evidence, and the respondents failed to show there was no triable issue.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; summary judgment set aside
Orders
- Summary judgment dismissing claims against respondents Dr. McIntyre, Dr. M.A. Virey and Mississauga Hospital set aside
- Costs of the appeal to the appellant fixed at $10,000 inclusive of disbursements and GST
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment