Chan v. Holland
The motion judge correctly concluded there was no air of reality to the appellant's claim that she believed the respondent was pursuing her tort claim; accordingly summary judgment was appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- 2011 ONCA 738
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Anita Siu Lai Chan; Defendant/respondent: James Holland Barrister and Solicitor; Defendant/respondent: Anthony Sik Kong Ngai; Defendant/respondent: Anthony Richardson & Associates; Third Party: Sue Chen; Third Party: Kai Kwong Yeung; Third Party: Yeung & Associates
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal Court of Appeal (summary Judgment Review)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Air of Reality, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anita Siu Lai Chan
Plaintiff/appellant
James Holland Barrister and Solicitor
Defendant/respondent
Anthony Sik Kong Ngai
Defendant/respondent
Anthony Richardson & Associates
Defendant/respondent
Sue Chen
Third Party
Kai Kwong Yeung
Third Party
Yeung & Associates
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal Court of Appeal (summary Judgment Review)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the motion judge erred in granting summary judgment
- 2 Whether there was an 'air of reality' to the appellant's claim that she believed the respondent was pursuing her tort claim
Ratio Decidendi
The motion judge correctly concluded there was no air of reality to the appellant's claim that she believed the respondent was pursuing her tort claim; accordingly summary judgment was appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Costs fixed at $7,500 inclusive of disbursements and H.S.T.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment