Byfield v. Toronto-Dominion Bank

Byfield v. Toronto-Dominion Bank

The motion judge did not err: the evidentiary record established the existence and performance of the contract at the asserted price, the appellant's forgery claim lacked corroboration, and the appellant failed to meet the evidentiary burden to resist summary judgment; accordingly there was no genuine issue for trial and summary judgment was properly granted, with costs awarded to European Table Inc.

Citation
2012 ONCA 49
Parties
Plaintiff (appellant): Luristein Byfield; Defendant (respondent): The Toronto-Dominion Bank; Defendant (respondent): European Table Inc.; Defendant (respondent): Mitra Gray
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 January 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Summary Judgment Motion (collection/contract) / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; summary judgment in favour of European Table Inc. upheld; costs awarded to European Table Inc.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Forgery Allegation, Contract Formation and Performance, Burden of Proof on Motions, Costs
Source Language
English
Civil Contract Procedural Law Collection Banking Law Summary Judgment Forgery Allegation Contract Formation and Performance +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Luristein Byfield

Plaintiff (appellant)

The Toronto-Dominion Bank

Defendant (respondent)

European Table Inc.

Defendant (respondent)

Mitra Gray

Defendant (respondent)

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal From Summary Judgment Motion (collection/contract) / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the motion judge made improper factual findings absent supporting or in the face of conflicting evidence
  2. 2 Whether the motion judge improperly shifted the burden to the appellant to prove a real chance of success when the respondent had to show no genuine issue for trial
  3. 3 Whether the appellant's forgery allegation was supported by corroborative evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The motion judge did not err: the evidentiary record established the existence and performance of the contract at the asserted price, the appellant's forgery claim lacked corroboration, and the appellant failed to meet the evidentiary burden to resist summary judgment; accordingly there was no genuine issue for trial and summary judgment was properly granted, with costs awarded to European Table Inc.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; summary judgment in favour of European Table Inc. upheld; costs awarded to European Table Inc.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Summary judgment granted in favour of European Table Inc. upheld.