Royal Bank of Canada v. King
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not establish payment: the instrument he presented was dishonoured, the Bank’s temporary credit did not discharge the debt, and the Canadian Payments Association Rules do not assist the debtor; therefore no genuine issue for trial existed and summary judgment was proper.
- Citation
- 2013 ONCA 524
- Parties
- Plaintiff (respondent): Royal Bank of Canada; Defendant (appellant): Leslie King
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Collection / Appeal From Summary Judgment (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Payment, Dishonoured Instrument, Canadian Payments Association Rules
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Royal Bank of Canada
Plaintiff (respondent)
Leslie King
Defendant (appellant)
Procedural Posture
Collection / Appeal From Summary Judgment (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant established a genuine issue for trial
- 2 Whether presentation of an instrument that was dishonoured constitutes payment
- 3 Whether a bank's temporary mistaken credit discharges a debtor
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not establish payment: the instrument he presented was dishonoured, the Bank’s temporary credit did not discharge the debt, and the Canadian Payments Association Rules do not assist the debtor; therefore no genuine issue for trial existed and summary judgment was proper.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Respondent entitled to costs of the appeal and of the stay motion fixed in the total amount of $10,000 including disbursements and GST
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment