Meridian Credit Union v. Nadesanantham

Meridian Credit Union v. Nadesanantham

The Court of Appeal found no error in the trial judge's granting of summary judgment or in the costs award and therefore dismissed the appeal.

Citation
2014 ONCA 453
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Meridian Credit Union; Defendant/respondent: Tharshana Nadesanantham; Defendant/respondent: 2182589 Ontario Inc. (operating as SPC Financial Services); Defendant/respondent: Priya Arumugavadivel; Defendant/respondent: Eric Alexander; Defendant/respondent: Shanugarajani Thangarajah (also known as “Rajani Thangarajah”); Defendant/respondent: Thangarajah Sivapatham
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Collection / Appeal From Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Costs, Appellate Review
Source Language
English
Civil Collection Appeal Costs Summary Judgment Appellate Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Meridian Credit Union

Plaintiff/appellant

Tharshana Nadesanantham

Defendant/respondent

2182589 Ontario Inc. (operating as SPC Financial Services)

Defendant/respondent

Priya Arumugavadivel

Defendant/respondent

Eric Alexander

Defendant/respondent

Shanugarajani Thangarajah (also known as “Rajani Thangarajah”)

Defendant/respondent

Thangarajah Sivapatham

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Collection / Appeal From Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment
  2. 2 Whether the costs award of $5,000 was inappropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found no error in the trial judge's granting of summary judgment or in the costs award and therefore dismissed the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Summary judgment granted by the trial judge is upheld