Toronto-Dominion Bank, N.A. v. Lloyd’s Underwriters
The appeal was allowed and the partial summary judgment set aside because the motion judge erred in law and procedurally by (1) misapplying Rule 20 to grant judgment on an isolated element of a claim rather than on part of the claim in the statement of claim, (2) failing to interpret the insurance policy as a whole (including the professional liability section and all elements of the fidelity insuring clause), (3) adopting an unpleaded constructive trust theory without affording the parties a fair opportunity to address it, and (4) misconstruing the insurers' requested relief; consequently the matter must proceed to trial.
- Citation
- 2017 ONCA 1011
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Toronto-Dominion Bank, N.A.; Defendants/appellants: Lloyd’s Underwriters and associated insurers (Antares, Catlin, Novae, Ace, Brit, Chaucer/Pembroke, Aspen, Great Lakes Reinsurance, Lexington, AIG group, Allied World, Arch, Axis, Chubb, Endurance, Houston Casualty, Liberty Mutual, Markel/Max Bermuda, XL, et al.)
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Insurance Coverage/contract / Appeal From Partial Summary Judgment; Order Set Aside; Action Directed to Proceed to Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; partial summary judgment set aside; action directed to proceed to trial; insurers awarded costs on partial indemnity scale fixed at $45,000 inclusive of disbursements and applicable taxes.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Policy Interpretation, Fidelity Bond Coverage, Professional Liability Coverage, Constructive Trust, Knowing Receipt, Knowing Assistance, Procedural Fairness, Rule 20
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Toronto-Dominion Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff/respondent
Lloyd’s Underwriters and associated insurers (Antares, Catlin, Novae, Ace, Brit, Chaucer/Pembroke, Aspen, Great Lakes Reinsurance, Lexington, AIG group, Allied World, Arch, Axis, Chubb, Endurance, Houston Casualty, Liberty Mutual, Markel/Max Bermuda, XL, et al.)
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Insurance Coverage/contract / Appeal From Partial Summary Judgment; Order Set Aside; Action Directed to Proceed to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the motion judge could properly grant partial summary judgment under Rule 20 on a single constituent element of a pleaded claim rather than on part of the claim itself
- 2 Proper interpretation of the fidelity coverage preamble term "direct financial loss" and related ownership clause in the context of the policy as a whole including the professional liability section
- 3 Whether the motion judge improperly adopted a constructive trust theory not pleaded or argued by the parties, creating procedural unfairness
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed and the partial summary judgment set aside because the motion judge erred in law and procedurally by (1) misapplying Rule 20 to grant judgment on an isolated element of a claim rather than on part of the claim in the statement of claim, (2) failing to interpret the insurance policy as a whole (including the professional liability section and all elements of the fidelity insuring clause), (3) adopting an unpleaded constructive trust theory without affording the parties a fair opportunity to address it, and (4) misconstruing the insurers' requested relief; consequently the matter must proceed to trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; partial summary judgment set aside; action directed to proceed to trial; insurers awarded costs on partial indemnity scale fixed at $45,000 inclusive of disbursements and applicable taxes.
Orders
- Order granting partial summary judgment set aside
- Action to proceed to trial subject to any further order below
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment