Royal Bank of Canada v. Peter

Royal Bank of Canada v. Peter

The motion judge correctly found there was no genuine issue for trial and that Ms. Lisa Peter and Lily John Enterprises Inc were liable; no error was shown requiring appellate intervention, therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Citation
2019 ONCA 537
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Royal Bank of Canada; Appellant/defendant: Lisa Peter (also known as Fu Ping Lisa Peter, Lisa Fuping Peter, Lisa Fu Ping Peter); Appellant/defendant: Lily John Enterprises Inc
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
26 June 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment (court of Appeal Review)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; summary judgment affirmed.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Liability, Costs, Appeal
Source Language
English
Civil Collection Summary Judgment Liability Costs Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Royal Bank of Canada

Plaintiff/respondent

Lisa Peter (also known as Fu Ping Lisa Peter, Lisa Fuping Peter, Lisa Fu Ping Peter)

Appellant/defendant

Lily John Enterprises Inc

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment (court of Appeal Review)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a genuine issue for trial precluding summary judgment
  2. 2 Whether Ms. Lisa Peter and Lily John Enterprises Inc were liable for the debt
  3. 3 Whether the motion judge erred in his findings and the extent of appellate review

Ratio Decidendi

The motion judge correctly found there was no genuine issue for trial and that Ms. Lisa Peter and Lily John Enterprises Inc were liable; no error was shown requiring appellate intervention, therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; summary judgment affirmed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Summary judgment affirmed