Konstantinopoulos v. Papadopoulos
The motion judge did not err in dismissing the appellant's claim on summary judgment, there was no evidence to support the appellant's allegations against respondent's counsel, and the counter-claim was properly dismissed by consent; accordingly the appeal is dismissed and costs are fixed at $16,500 inclusive.
- Citation
- 2019 ONCA 773
- Parties
- Plaintiff (appellant): Constantinos (Gus) Konstantinopoulos; Defendant (respondent): Demetrios Papadopoulos
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment Motion
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Boundary Dispute, Costs, Allegations of Counsel Misconduct
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Constantinos (Gus) Konstantinopoulos
Plaintiff (appellant)
Demetrios Papadopoulos
Defendant (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the motion judge erred in dismissing the appellant's claim on summary judgment
- 2 Whether allegations against the respondent's counsel were supported by evidence
- 3 Whether the counter-claim should be dismissed and on what basis
Ratio Decidendi
The motion judge did not err in dismissing the appellant's claim on summary judgment, there was no evidence to support the appellant's allegations against respondent's counsel, and the counter-claim was properly dismissed by consent; accordingly the appeal is dismissed and costs are fixed at $16,500 inclusive.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Counter-claim dismissed by consent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment