Canada v. Bezan Cattle Corporation
For purposes of SFSA s.31 the term 'farmer' means a mortgagor in the sense of a person who has granted a mortgage over farm land (or falls within the specific inclusions in the SFSA definition); it does not extend to persons who merely grant security in personal property (chattel mortgages). Because there was no evidence Bezan Cattle had granted a mortgage over farm land, SFSA s.31 did not apply and the Federal Court erred in dismissing the claim against the individual Bezans; summary judgment against the Bezans was properly entered on the record; the cross-appeal challenging summary judgment against Bezan Cattle was dismissed.
- Citation
- 2023 FCA 95
- Parties
- Appellant (respondent by Cross Appeal): His Majesty the King in Right of Canada; Respondent (appellant by Cross Appeal): Bezan Cattle Corporation; Respondent (appellant by Cross Appeal): Barbara Bezan; Respondent (appellant by Cross Appeal): Layton Bezan
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Summary Judgment (subrogation/recovery Under Ampa) / Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal Following Federal Court Summary Judgment Motion
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part: Federal Court judgment dismissing claim against Barbara and Layton Bezan set aside; summary judgment granted against Barbara and Layton Bezan. Cross-appeal by Bezan Cattle dismissed; summary judgment against Bezan Cattle upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Subrogation, Guarantee Formalities, Mortgage Vs Chattel Mortgage, Interpretation of 'mortgagor'/'farmer', Duress, Unconscionability, Acceptance by Conduct
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty the King in Right of Canada
Appellant (respondent by Cross Appeal)
Bezan Cattle Corporation
Respondent (appellant by Cross Appeal)
Barbara Bezan
Respondent (appellant by Cross Appeal)
Layton Bezan
Respondent (appellant by Cross Appeal)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Summary Judgment (subrogation/recovery Under Ampa) / Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal Following Federal Court Summary Judgment Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether SFSA s.31 applies to the Joint and Several Guarantee executed by individual shareholders
- 2 Whether 'farmer'/'mortgagor' in SFSA s.31 includes a chattel mortgagor (grantor of security in personal property)
- 3 Whether the Federal Court erred in granting summary judgment against Bezan Cattle
Ratio Decidendi
For purposes of SFSA s.31 the term 'farmer' means a mortgagor in the sense of a person who has granted a mortgage over farm land (or falls within the specific inclusions in the SFSA definition); it does not extend to persons who merely grant security in personal property (chattel mortgages). Because there was no evidence Bezan Cattle had granted a mortgage over farm land, SFSA s.31 did not apply and the Federal Court erred in dismissing the claim against the individual Bezans; summary judgment against the Bezans was properly entered on the record; the cross-appeal challenging summary judgment against Bezan Cattle was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part: Federal Court judgment dismissing claim against Barbara and Layton Bezan set aside; summary judgment granted against Barbara and Layton Bezan. Cross-appeal by Bezan Cattle dismissed; summary judgment against Bezan Cattle upheld.
Orders
- Set aside Federal Court order dismissing action against Barbara and Layton Bezan
- Enter summary judgment against Barbara Bezan and Layton Bezan in favour of the Attorney General of Canada (Minister) consistent with Federal Courts Act s.53(1)(b)(i)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment