Cyr v. Canada (Attorney General)

Cyr v. Canada (Attorney General)

The trial judge properly understood the Appeal Board's decision; therefore the application for judicial review was correctly dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2002 FCA 68
Parties
Appellant: Sylvie Cyr; Appellant: Suzanne Godin; Respondent: Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal From Federal Court (trial Division) Decision / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Administrative Tribunal Decision, Standard of Review, Costs
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Appeal Interpretation of Administrative Tribunal Decision Standard of Review Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sylvie Cyr

Appellant

Suzanne Godin

Appellant

Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal From Federal Court (trial Division) Decision / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge properly interpreted the Appeal Board decision
  2. 2 Whether the application for judicial review should be dismissed

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge properly understood the Appeal Board's decision; therefore the application for judicial review was correctly dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Respondent awarded costs.