Barcode-Symbol - Reasons and Order allowing a motion for summary disposition by Symbol of its section 106 application
Because Barcode had ceased to be a going concern and its assets (including intangibles necessary to operate the business) were sold to a third party, the factual basis for the Tribunal's January 15, 2004 order granting Leave no longer existed; there was no genuine basis for Barcode's Response and s.106 required rescission of the Leave order.
- Citation
- 2005 Comp Trib 32
- Parties
- Applicant: Symbol Technologies Canada ULC; Respondent: Barcode Systems Inc.; Respondent: Price Waterhouse Coopers Inc. as Interim Receiver of Barcode Systems Inc.
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Section 106 Rescission Application Under the Competition Act; Motion for Summary Disposition / Decision on Motion for Summary Disposition (written Reasons)
- Outcome
- Motion for summary disposition allowed; s.106 application allowed; Leave rescinded.
- Legal Topics
- Section 106 Rescission of Leave, Leave Under S.103.1, Summary Disposition Under Competition Tribunal Act S.9(4) (5), Supply/interim Supply Orders, Effect of Asset Sale on Remedies
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Symbol Technologies Canada ULC
Applicant
Barcode Systems Inc.
Respondent
Price Waterhouse Coopers Inc. as Interim Receiver of Barcode Systems Inc.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 106 Rescission Application Under the Competition Act; Motion for Summary Disposition / Decision on Motion for Summary Disposition (written Reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order granting leave under s.103.1 should be rescinded under s.106 due to changed circumstances
- 2 Whether there is a genuine basis for the respondent's (Barcode's) Response to the s.106 application
- 3 Whether Barcode's cessation as a going concern and sale of assets defeats the rationale for granting leave and any prospective supply order
Ratio Decidendi
Because Barcode had ceased to be a going concern and its assets (including intangibles necessary to operate the business) were sold to a third party, the factual basis for the Tribunal's January 15, 2004 order granting Leave no longer existed; there was no genuine basis for Barcode's Response and s.106 required rescission of the Leave order.
Court Disposition
Motion for summary disposition allowed; s.106 application allowed; Leave rescinded.
Orders
- The Motion and the s.106 application are allowed; the Order dated January 15, 2004 granting Leave is rescinded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment