R. v. T.D.R.
A three-month custodial sentence on each count, to be served concurrently with each other and with any time served, is proportionate given the age of the offences, the offender's rehabilitative progress and risk factors; a victim surcharge is declined because it would cause undue hardship; concurrency preserves the offender's federal warrant expiry date.
- Citation
- 2015 NSPC 26
- Parties
- Prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: T.D.R.
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to three months custody on each of the four charges, to be served concurrently with each other and concurrently with any time served; victim surcharge declined.
- Legal Topics
- Property Offences, Concurrent Sentences, Victim Surcharge, Parole/warrant Expiry, Rehabilitation and Addiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Prosecution
T.D.R.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate custodial sentence for historical property offences
- 2 Whether victim surcharge should be imposed or waived due to undue hardship
- 3 Whether sentences should be concurrent and effect on federal warrant expiry
Ratio Decidendi
A three-month custodial sentence on each count, to be served concurrently with each other and with any time served, is proportionate given the age of the offences, the offender's rehabilitative progress and risk factors; a victim surcharge is declined because it would cause undue hardship; concurrency preserves the offender's federal warrant expiry date.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to three months custody on each of the four charges, to be served concurrently with each other and concurrently with any time served; victim surcharge declined.
Orders
- Three month sentence on each of the four charges to be served concurrently to each other and concurrently with time already served
- No victim surcharge imposed due to undue hardship
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment