Telecommunications Workers Union v. Telus Mobility
The Notice of Appeal, which detailed twelve alleged errors, was sufficient on the facts to show an arguable appeal; the applicant demonstrated special circumstances (misunderstanding about the Christmas recess communicated by the Registry); and, weighing all factors, the interests of justice required granting an extension of time to file the Notice of Appeal under s.27(2).
- Citation
- 2003 FCT 253
- Parties
- Applicant: Telecommunications Workers Union; Respondent: Telus Mobility
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Extension Motion / Motion Decided on Written Submissions
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted to file Notice of Appeal
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Computation of Time, Appeal Period, Christmas Recess, Notice of Appeal Sufficiency
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Telecommunications Workers Union
Applicant
Telus Mobility
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Extension Motion / Motion Decided on Written Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to extend time for filing an appeal under s.27(2) of the Federal Court Act
- 2 Whether a Notice of Appeal alone discloses an arguable issue sufficient to justify an extension
- 3 Whether the Christmas recess is excluded from the 30-day appeal period in s.27(2)
Ratio Decidendi
The Notice of Appeal, which detailed twelve alleged errors, was sufficient on the facts to show an arguable appeal; the applicant demonstrated special circumstances (misunderstanding about the Christmas recess communicated by the Registry); and, weighing all factors, the interests of justice required granting an extension of time to file the Notice of Appeal under s.27(2).
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted to file Notice of Appeal
Orders
- The applicant's motion for an extension of time to file its Notice of Appeal is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment