Dinunzio v. Hamilton (City)
The Court agreed with the reasons of the motion judge and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2011 ONCA 66
- Parties
- Appellant: Teresa Dinunzio; Appellant: Danny Dinunzio; Respondent: City of Hamilton; Respondent: Hamilton Police Services Board; Respondent: Hamilton Police Service; Respondent: Brian J. Mullan; Respondent: Ken Leendertse; Respondent: Paul F. Ryan; Respondent: Marco Visentini; Respondent: Dalton Timmis Insurance Group
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Superior Court Order (motion Judge) Dated July 12, 2010
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Dismissal, Motion Judge Reasons, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teresa Dinunzio
Appellant
Danny Dinunzio
Appellant
City of Hamilton
Respondent
Hamilton Police Services Board
Respondent
Hamilton Police Service
Respondent
Brian J. Mullan
Respondent
Ken Leendertse
Respondent
Paul F. Ryan
Respondent
Marco Visentini
Respondent
Dalton Timmis Insurance Group
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Superior Court Order (motion Judge) Dated July 12, 2010
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the motion judge erred in his reasons
- 2 Whether the appellants entitled to succeed on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Court agreed with the reasons of the motion judge and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Dinunzio v. Hamilton (City) Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2011-01-24 Neutral citation 2011 ONCA 66 Docket numbers C52523 Judges Laskin, John Ivan; Lang, Susan Elizabeth; LaForme, Harry Smith Subject Civil Decision Content CITATION: Dinunzio v. Hamilton (City), 2011 ONCA 66 DATE: 20110124 DOCKET: C52523 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Laskin, Lang and LaForme JJ.A. BETWEEN Teresa Dinunzio and Danny Dinunzio, in his personal capacity and on behalf of Family Law Act R.S.O. 1990 claimants Plaintiffs (Appellants) and City of Hamilton, Hamilton Police Services Board, Hamilton Police Service, Brian J. Mullan, Ken Leendertse, Paul F. Ryan, Marco Visentini and Dalton Timmis Insurance Group Defendants (Respondents) David Keith Alderson and Javad Heydary, for the appellants C. Kirk Boggs and Kirk F. Stevens, for the respondents Heard: January 21, 2011 On appeal from the order of Justice Lawrence Patillo of the Superior Court of Justice, dated July 12, 2010. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] We agree with the reasons of the motion judge. The appeal is dismissed.