Penny v. Bouch
The Court held the Nova Scotia Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act applies to this proceeding; on balancing Muscutt/Amchem factors the court found a real and substantial connection to Nova Scotia (damage now sited here, ongoing treatment and witnesses in Nova Scotia, and unfairness to impecunious...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2008 NSSC 378
- Parties
- Plaintiff (infant Represented): Caiden Christopher Penny (infant) by his Litigation Guardian Vicki Penny; Plaintiff (litigation Guardian and Personal Capacity): Vicki Penny; Defendant (physician): Peter J. Bouch; Defendant (physician): William R. Young; Defendant (physician): Jared Yeung; Defendant (physician): Richard Moffatt; Defendant (corporate Hospital): David Thompson Health Region, carrying on business as the Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Medical Malpractice / Personal Injury / Application to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Or, Alternatively, Stay on Forum Non Conveniens Grounds
- Outcome
- Defendants' application to dismiss or stay for lack of jurisdiction/forum non conveniens dismissed; action to proceed in Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Legal Topics
- Territorial Competence, Real and Substantial Connection, Forum Non Conveniens, Choice of Forum, Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caiden Christopher Penny (infant) by his Litigation Guardian Vicki Penny
Plaintiff (infant Represented)
Vicki Penny
Plaintiff (litigation Guardian and Personal Capacity)
Peter J. Bouch
Defendant (physician)
William R. Young
Defendant (physician)
Jared Yeung
Defendant (physician)
Richard Moffatt
Defendant (physician)
David Thompson Health Region, carrying on business as the Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre
Defendant (corporate Hospital)
Procedural Posture
Medical Malpractice / Personal Injury / Application to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Or, Alternatively, Stay on Forum Non Conveniens Grounds
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act apply to proceedings commenced before its commencement?
- 2 Is there a real and substantial connection between Nova Scotia and the subject matter/parties such that the court has territorial competence?
- 3 If territorial competence exists, should the court decline to exercise it because Alberta is a clearly more appropriate forum?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the Nova Scotia Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act applies to this proceeding; on balancing Muscutt/Amchem factors the court found a real and substantial connection to Nova Scotia (damage now sited here, ongoing treatment and witnesses in Nova Scotia, and unfairness to impecunious plaintiffs if forced to litigate in Alberta) and concluded defendants failed to show Alberta is clearly a more appropriate forum; therefore the application to dismiss or stay was dismissed and the action may proceed in Nova Scotia.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application to dismiss or stay for lack of jurisdiction/forum non conveniens dismissed; action to proceed in Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Orders
- Application dismissed; action permitted to proceed in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Costs to plaintiffs of this application to be assessed in accordance with Tariff C under section 63 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment