Das Estate (Re)
The Court held that (1) two informal documents found with the deceased were admissible as persuasive evidence under s.8A but did not alter the April 2010 will; (2) the testator had testamentary capacity; (3) the account number typo was corrected as falsa demonstratio; and (4) because the will failed to provide for the RBC investment account and the residuary gift was conditional on the wife predeceasing within ten days, the Court could not supply omitted words or identify beneficiaries with sufficient certainty to create a trust; consequently the investment account and the undisposed residue passed on a partial intestacy to the surviving spouse and daughter pursuant to the Intestate...
- Citation
- 2012 NSSC 441
- Parties
- Applicant; Personal Representative, Executrix and Trustee Under the Last Will and Testament of Hari Das: Mallika Das; Respondent; Daughter and Alternate Executor/trustee Named in Will: Nitya Deepa Das (Acevedo)
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Estate Will Interpretation and Motion for Directions / Decision on Motion for Directions (written Reasons)
- Outcome
- Declare partial intestacy: RBC Direct Action Investment Account and residue not effectively disposed by will and to pass to surviving spouse and daughter under Intestate Succession Act; costs to applicant on solicitor‑client basis; directions to provide certified copies of reasons and order to respondent and named...
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Construction of Wills, Partial Intestacy, Falsa Demonstratio, Testamentary Writings (s.8 A), Charitable Purpose Trust Validity
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mallika Das
Applicant; Personal Representative, Executrix and Trustee Under the Last Will and Testament of Hari Das
Nitya Deepa Das (Acevedo)
Respondent; Daughter and Alternate Executor/trustee Named in Will
Procedural Posture
Probate and Estate Will Interpretation and Motion for Directions / Decision on Motion for Directions (written Reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes testamentary writing(s) under s.8A of the Wills Act?
- 2 Whether testator had testamentary capacity at execution of April 2010 will and immediately prior to death
- 3 Whether erroneous account number is to be treated as falsa demonstratio
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that (1) two informal documents found with the deceased were admissible as persuasive evidence under s.8A but did not alter the April 2010 will; (2) the testator had testamentary capacity; (3) the account number typo was corrected as falsa demonstratio; and (4) because the will failed to provide for the RBC investment account and the residuary gift was conditional on the wife predeceasing within ten days, the Court could not supply omitted words or identify beneficiaries with sufficient certainty to create a trust; consequently the investment account and the undisposed residue passed on a partial intestacy to the surviving spouse and daughter pursuant to the Intestate...
Court Disposition
Declare partial intestacy: RBC Direct Action Investment Account and residue not effectively disposed by will and to pass to surviving spouse and daughter under Intestate Succession Act; costs to applicant on solicitor‑client basis; directions to provide certified copies of reasons and order to respondent and named...
Orders
- Declare that the RBC Direct Action Investment Account (account identified in will, corrected by falsa demonstratio) and the undisposed residue are not effectively disposed by the April 23, 2010 Will and are subject to partial intestacy
- Direct that the undisposed estate funds be distributed to the surviving spouse, Mallika Das, and daughter, Nitya Deepa Das (Acevedo), in accordance with the Intestate Succession Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.236
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment