R. v. Ashley

R. v. Ashley

The court found the s.486.2(2) test satisfied for four complainants because reported anxiety/PTSD-like symptoms, the nature of the offences (sexual touching during therapeutic sessions), the Indigenous status of complainants viewed in historical context, and society's interest in victim participation collectively...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2024 BCSC 2264
Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Accused: Donald Wayne Ashley
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
7 August 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Voir Dire on Testimonial Accommodation (oral Ruling)
Outcome
Support person order granted for all complainants; Video testimony order granted for complainants on Counts 1, 3, 4 and 6; Application re Count 2 deferred with leave to reapply.
Legal Topics
Testimonial Accommodation, Support Person, CCTV Testimony, S.486.1, S.486.2, Sexual Assault
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Evidence Indigenous Peoples Law Testimonial Accommodation Support Person CCTV Testimony S.486.1 S.486.2 +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Donald Wayne Ashley

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sexual Assault / Voir Dire on Testimonial Accommodation (oral Ruling)

  1. 1 Whether to grant support persons under s.486.1(2) for complainants
  2. 2 Whether to order testimony outside the courtroom under s.486.2(2) for four complainants
  3. 3 Sufficiency of evidentiary basis for testimonial accommodation

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the s.486.2(2) test satisfied for four complainants because reported anxiety/PTSD-like symptoms, the nature of the offences (sexual touching during therapeutic sessions), the Indigenous status of complainants viewed in historical context, and society's interest in victim participation collectively meant video testimony would facilitate full and candid accounts and serve the proper administration of justice; support person orders under s.486.1(2) were granted with the accused's consent.

Court Disposition

Support person order granted for all complainants; Video testimony order granted for complainants on Counts 1, 3, 4 and 6; Application re Count 2 deferred with leave to reapply.

Orders

  • Grant support person for each complainant pursuant to s.486.1(2) of the Criminal Code
  • Order that complainants on Counts 1, 3, 4 and 6 may testify outside the courtroom by CCTV pursuant to s.486.2(2) of the Criminal Code