R. v. Ashley
The court found the s.486.2(2) test satisfied for four complainants because reported anxiety/PTSD-like symptoms, the nature of the offences (sexual touching during therapeutic sessions), the Indigenous status of complainants viewed in historical context, and society's interest in victim participation collectively...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2024 BCSC 2264
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Accused: Donald Wayne Ashley
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Assault / Voir Dire on Testimonial Accommodation (oral Ruling)
- Outcome
- Support person order granted for all complainants; Video testimony order granted for complainants on Counts 1, 3, 4 and 6; Application re Count 2 deferred with leave to reapply.
- Legal Topics
- Testimonial Accommodation, Support Person, CCTV Testimony, S.486.1, S.486.2, Sexual Assault
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Donald Wayne Ashley
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Voir Dire on Testimonial Accommodation (oral Ruling)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant support persons under s.486.1(2) for complainants
- 2 Whether to order testimony outside the courtroom under s.486.2(2) for four complainants
- 3 Sufficiency of evidentiary basis for testimonial accommodation
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the s.486.2(2) test satisfied for four complainants because reported anxiety/PTSD-like symptoms, the nature of the offences (sexual touching during therapeutic sessions), the Indigenous status of complainants viewed in historical context, and society's interest in victim participation collectively meant video testimony would facilitate full and candid accounts and serve the proper administration of justice; support person orders under s.486.1(2) were granted with the accused's consent.
Court Disposition
Support person order granted for all complainants; Video testimony order granted for complainants on Counts 1, 3, 4 and 6; Application re Count 2 deferred with leave to reapply.
Orders
- Grant support person for each complainant pursuant to s.486.1(2) of the Criminal Code
- Order that complainants on Counts 1, 3, 4 and 6 may testify outside the courtroom by CCTV pursuant to s.486.2(2) of the Criminal Code
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment