Teva Canada Limited v. Bayer Inc.
The Court ordered that the reasons for judgment in file A-16-20 shall constitute the reasons for judgment in this appeal (A-15-20).
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2020 FCA 72
- Parties
- Appellant: Teva Canada Limited; Respondent: Bayer Inc. and Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH; Respondent: Apotex Inc.; Respondent: Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Respondent: Sandoz Canada Inc.
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Reasons for Judgment Adopted / Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Reasons in file A-16-20 adopted as the reasons for judgment in this appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of Reasons From Another File, Procedural Disposition
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teva Canada Limited
Appellant
Bayer Inc. and Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH
Respondent
Apotex Inc.
Respondent
Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Respondent
Sandoz Canada Inc.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Reasons for Judgment Adopted / Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should adopt the reasons for judgment in file A-16-20 as the reasons in this appeal
- 2 Whether any separate disposition was required for this appeal beyond adoption of those reasons
Ratio Decidendi
The Court ordered that the reasons for judgment in file A-16-20 shall constitute the reasons for judgment in this appeal (A-15-20).
Court Disposition
Reasons in file A-16-20 adopted as the reasons for judgment in this appeal.
Orders
- The attached copy of the reasons for judgment in file A-16-20 shall constitute the reasons for judgment in this appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Teva Canada Limited v. Bayer Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2020-04-08 Neutral citation 2020 FCA 72 File numbers A-15-20 Decision Content Date: 20200408 Docket: A-15-20 Citation: 2020 FCA 72 CORAM: DE MONTIGNY J.A. WOODS J.A. LASKIN J.A. BETWEEN: TEVA CANADA LIMITED Appellant and BAYER INC. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH, APOTEX INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and SANDOZ CANADA INC. Respondents Heard by teleconference at Ottawa, Ontario, and Toronto, Ontario, on April 1, 2020. Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on April 8, 2020. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: LASKIN J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: DE MONTIGNY J.A. WOODS J.A. Date: 20200408 Docket: A-15-20 Citation: 2020 FCA 72 CORAM: DE MONTIGNY J.A. WOODS J.A. LASKIN J.A. BETWEEN: TEVA CANADA LIMITED Appellant and BAYER INC. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH, APOTEX INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and SANDOZ CANADA INC. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT LASKIN J.A. [1] The attached copy of the reasons for judgment in file A-16-20 shall constitute the reasons for judgment in this appeal. “J.B. Laskin” J.A. “I agree. Yves de Montigny J.A.” “I agree. Judith Woods J.A.” FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: A-15-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: TEVA CANADA LIMITED v. BAYER INC. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH, APOTEX INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and SANDOZ CANADA INC. PLACE OF HEARING: by teleconference at Ottawa, Ontario, and Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: April 1, 2020 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: LASKIN J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: DE MONTIGNY J.A. WOODS J.A. DATED: April 8, 2020 APPEARANCES: J. Bradley White Faylene Lunn For The Appellant Melissa Binns Will Boyer Natalia Thawe For The Respondents Bayer iNc. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH Daniel Cappe Harry Radomski FOR THE RESPONDENT apotex inc. Andrew Mandlsohn FOR THE RESPONDENT TARO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. Carol Hitchman Meghan A. Dureen, Ph.D. FOR THE RESPONDENT SANDOZ CANADA INC. SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Ottawa, Ontario For The Appellant Gowling WLG Hamilton and Ottawa, Ontario For The Respondents Bayer iNc. and BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH Goodmans LLP Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT apotex inc. Fineberg Ramamoorthy LLP Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT taro pharmaceuticals INC. Sprigings Intellectual Property Law Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT SANDOZ CANADA INC.