Canada (Attorney General) v. Worden

Canada (Attorney General) v. Worden

The Umpire's decision was not unreasonable because the Board of Referees' findings of fact were reasonably open to it, therefore the appeal was properly dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2004 FCA 83
Parties
Applicant: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; Respondent: JEFFREY WORDEN
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Federal Court of Appeal Decision
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed
Legal Topics
Standard of Review, Reasonableness, Findings of Fact, Costs
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Tribunal Review Judicial Review Standard of Review Reasonableness Findings of Fact Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

JEFFREY WORDEN

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Judicial Review / Federal Court of Appeal Decision

  1. 1 Whether the Umpire's decision was unreasonable
  2. 2 Whether the Board of Referees' findings of fact were reasonably open to it

Ratio Decidendi

The Umpire's decision was not unreasonable because the Board of Referees' findings of fact were reasonably open to it, therefore the appeal was properly dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs to respondent as agreed in the amount of $8,500 inclusive of fees, disbursements and GST