Canada (Attorney General) v. Walsh
The Court dismissed the application because it was not persuaded that the Umpire made any error of law or fact warranting intervention; accordingly the Umpire's decision stands and the application fails.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2008 FCA 220
- Parties
- Applicant: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; Respondent: JULIET WALSH
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standard of Review, Error of Law, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
JULIET WALSH
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Umpire made any error of law or fact requiring appellate intervention
- 2 Whether the Applicant is entitled to set aside the Umpire's decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Court dismissed the application because it was not persuaded that the Umpire made any error of law or fact warranting intervention; accordingly the Umpire's decision stands and the application fails.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs of $1000 plus disbursements payable to the respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Canada (Attorney General) v. Walsh Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-06-19 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 220 File numbers A-304-07 Decision Content Date: 20080619 Docket: A-304-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 220 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JULIET WALSH Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 19, 2008. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 19, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. Date: 20080619 Docket: A-304-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 220 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JULIET WALSH Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 19, 2008) LINDEN J.A. [1] We are not persuaded that the Umpire made any error of law or fact that would require us to intervene in this matter. [2] The application will, therefore, be dismissed with costs of $1000 plus disbursements payable to the respondent. "A.M. Linden" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-304-07 STYLE OF CAUSE: THE AGC v. JULIET WALSH PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: June 19, 2008 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. TRUDEL J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LINDEN J.A. APPEARANCES: Malcolm Palmer FOR THE APPLICANT John Kleefeld FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John H. Sims Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE APPLICANT John Kleefeld Barrister & Solicitor Vancouver, B.C. FOR THE RESPONDENT