Canada (Attorney General) v. McNally Construction Inc.

Canada (Attorney General) v. McNally Construction Inc.

Leave to intervene was granted because, despite mootness conceded by the applicant, the administration of justice justified deciding the issue and the Tribunal could provide necessary adversarial argument on the standard of review and the shipbuilding and repair exclusion without compromising its impartiality; leave...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2002 FCA 111
Parties
Applicant: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; Respondent: McNALLY CONSTRUCTION INC.; Respondent: ABCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED; Intervener: Canadian International Trade Tribunal
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
20 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interlocutory — Motion to Intervene Granted; Hearing Rescheduled
Outcome
Motion to intervene granted to the Canadian International Trade Tribunal; intervention limited to written submissions and oral argument; procedural timetable set and hearing rescheduled.
Legal Topics
Intervention, Mootness, Standard of Review, Government Procurement, Nafta/wto Exclusion (shipbuilding and Repair)
Source Language
en
Administrative Law International Trade Law Judicial Review Intervention Mootness Standard of Review Government Procurement Nafta/wto Exclusion (shipbuilding and Repair)

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

McNALLY CONSTRUCTION INC.

Respondent

ABCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Respondent

Canadian International Trade Tribunal

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Interlocutory — Motion to Intervene Granted; Hearing Rescheduled

  1. 1 Whether leave to intervene should be granted to the Tribunal
  2. 2 Whether a moot judicial review application should nevertheless be heard in the public interest
  3. 3 Determination of the applicable standard of review

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to intervene was granted because, despite mootness conceded by the applicant, the administration of justice justified deciding the issue and the Tribunal could provide necessary adversarial argument on the standard of review and the shipbuilding and repair exclusion without compromising its impartiality; leave was conditioned and limited by specific procedural directions.

Court Disposition

Motion to intervene granted to the Canadian International Trade Tribunal; intervention limited to written submissions and oral argument; procedural timetable set and hearing rescheduled.

Orders

  • The Tribunal be granted leave to intervene in Federal Court of Appeal File No. A-7-02.
  • The style of cause in any further proceeding include the Tribunal as intervener.