Canada (Attorney General) v. Laurin
The Court was not persuaded that the Umpire erred in a manner that would justify interference with its decision and therefore dismissed the application for judicial review.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2001 FCA 59
- Parties
- Applicant: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; Respondent: PAULINE LAURIN
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standard of Review, Error of Law, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
PAULINE LAURIN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Umpire erred in a manner that would justify the Court interfering with its decision
- 2 Whether relief sought in the application for judicial review should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was not persuaded that the Umpire erred in a manner that would justify interference with its decision and therefore dismissed the application for judicial review.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Costs to the Respondent in the sum of $100.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Canada (Attorney General) v. Laurin Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-03-13 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 59 File numbers A-784-99 Decision Content Date: 20010313 Docket: A-784-99 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 59 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant - and - PAULINE LAURIN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on Tuesday, March 13, 2001 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20010313 Docket: A-784-99 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 59 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant - and - PAULINE LAURIN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Tuesday, March 13, 2001) ROTHSTEIN J.A. _. We have not been persuaded that the Umpire erred in a manner that would justify this Court interfering with its decision. _. The application for judicial review is dismissed with costs to the Respondent in the sum of $100.00. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record DOCKET: A-7843-99 STYLE OF CAUSE: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant - and - PAULINE LAURIN Respondent DATE OF HEARING: TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Tuesday, March 13, 2001 APPEARANCES BY: Mr. André Chamberlain For the Applicant Ms. Pauline Laurin For the Respondent on her own behalf SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada For the Applicant Ms. Pauline Laurin 13 Camille Street Lafontaine, Ontario R.R. 3 Penetanguishene L9M 1R3 For the Respondent on her own behalf FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL Date: 20010313 Docket: A-784-99 BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant - and - PAULINE LAURIN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT