Canada (Attorney General) v. Remstar Distribution Inc.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Remstar Distribution Inc.

The Tax Court judge's finding that each Rémillard controlled over 40% of the voting shares was not in error; consequently their positions were not insurable employment and the application for judicial review was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2004 FCA 8
Parties
Applicant: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; Respondent: REMSTAR DISTRIBUTION INC.
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Decision on Appeal
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Insurable Employment, Control of Voting Shares, Judicial Review, Control Test
Source Language
en
Employment Insurance Administrative Law Tax Law Corporate Law Insurable Employment Control of Voting Shares Judicial Review Control Test

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

REMSTAR DISTRIBUTION INC.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Decision on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether Maxime and Julien Rémillard each controlled over 40% of the voting shares of the companies for which they worked
  2. 2 Whether the employment of Maxime and Julien Rémillard was insurable employment
  3. 3 Whether the Tax Court judge erred in his findings of control and insurability

Ratio Decidendi

The Tax Court judge's finding that each Rémillard controlled over 40% of the voting shares was not in error; consequently their positions were not insurable employment and the application for judicial review was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for judicial review is dismissed with costs.
  • A copy of these reasons shall be filed in cases A-585-02 and A-586-02 in support of the judgments dismissing the applications for judicial review.