R. v. Corporation of the Town of Fort Erie

R. v. Corporation of the Town of Fort Erie

Where the evidence is insufficient to prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt, the correct appellate options were to uphold the acquittal or to enter a conviction based on findings; ordering a new trial in the face of demonstrable evidentiary gaps was an error. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the order...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
C29087
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen (Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy); Appellant: The Corporation of the Town of Fort Erie
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 July 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal to the Court of Appeal From Provincial Court Decision (review of Acquittal and Order for New Trial)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; order for new trial set aside; acquittal restored; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Acquittal, Insufficiency of Evidence, Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt, New Trial, Appellate Remedies
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Environmental Regulatory Enforcement Appellate Procedure Acquittal Insufficiency of Evidence Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt New Trial Appellate Remedies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen (Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy)

Respondent

The Corporation of the Town of Fort Erie

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal to the Court of Appeal From Provincial Court Decision (review of Acquittal and Order for New Trial)

  1. 1 Whether the respondent proved the offence beyond a reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether ordering a new trial was appropriate where the evidence was deficient and the justice of the peace acquitted

Ratio Decidendi

Where the evidence is insufficient to prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt, the correct appellate options were to uphold the acquittal or to enter a conviction based on findings; ordering a new trial in the face of demonstrable evidentiary gaps was an error. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the order for a new trial and restored the acquittal.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; order for new trial set aside; acquittal restored; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Order for new trial set aside