Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vidaurre Cortes

Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vidaurre Cortes

Because both parties informed the Court the matter was moot and no exceptional circumstances were identified to justify hearing a moot appeal, the Court declined to exercise its discretion and dismissed the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 FCA 8
Parties
Appellant: THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION; Respondent: WARREN ALFREDO VIDAURRE CORTES; Respondent: ANGELITA ROSELA SOLANO QUESADA
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
9 January 2008
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal (federal Court of Appeal) / Appeal Heard; Matter Found Moot; Discretion Not Exercised; Appeal Dismissed
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Mootness, Judicial Discretion to Refuse Moot Appeals, Dismissal of Appeal
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Administrative Law Appellate Procedure Mootness Judicial Discretion to Refuse Moot Appeals Dismissal of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Appellant

WARREN ALFREDO VIDAURRE CORTES

Respondent

ANGELITA ROSELA SOLANO QUESADA

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal (federal Court of Appeal) / Appeal Heard; Matter Found Moot; Discretion Not Exercised; Appeal Dismissed

  1. 1 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to hear an appeal that has become moot
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed as moot

Ratio Decidendi

Because both parties informed the Court the matter was moot and no exceptional circumstances were identified to justify hearing a moot appeal, the Court declined to exercise its discretion and dismissed the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.