Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Ishaq

Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Ishaq

The impugned change in CIC policy was correctly found to be mandatory in effect; because paragraph 27(1)(h) of the Citizenship Act delegates regulation of the oath to the Governor in Council and the mandatory policy was not adopted by the Governor in Council, the policy was unlawful and the Minister's appeal must be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2015 FCA 194
Parties
Appellant: The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration; Respondent: Zunera Ishaq; Intervener: Attorney General of Ontario
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Federal Court Judgment Concerning Citizenship Policy / Decision on Appeal by Federal Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Oath of Citizenship, Niqab Policy, Policy Versus Regulation, Delegation to Governor in Council, Charter Challenge (declined)
Source Language
en
Immigration Citizenship Administrative Law Constitutional Law Oath of Citizenship Niqab Policy Policy Versus Regulation Delegation to Governor in Council +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Appellant

Zunera Ishaq

Respondent

Attorney General of Ontario

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Federal Court Judgment Concerning Citizenship Policy / Decision on Appeal by Federal Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the change in CIC policy requiring unveiling for the citizenship oath was mandatory rather than discretionary
  2. 2 Whether a mandatory policy of that nature required adoption by the Governor in Council under the Citizenship Act
  3. 3 Whether the impugned policy conflicted with the Citizenship Act and its regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The impugned change in CIC policy was correctly found to be mandatory in effect; because paragraph 27(1)(h) of the Citizenship Act delegates regulation of the oath to the Governor in Council and the mandatory policy was not adopted by the Governor in Council, the policy was unlawful and the Minister's appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs