Pelican Lake Band Appeal Board v. Abbott

Pelican Lake Band Appeal Board v. Abbott

Because the 2001 band council's term expired and a new election occurred, the dispute no longer presented a live controversy; the appeal was therefore dismissed as moot and not entertained.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2004 FCA 379
Parties
Appellant: THE PELICAN LAKE BAND APPEAL BOARD; Respondent: HARVEY ABBOTT; Respondent: EDWARD BILL; Respondent: JIMMY BILL
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
9 November 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Dismissed for Mootness (final Disposition)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for mootness
Legal Topics
Mootness, Band Council Election Validity, Justiciability
Source Language
en
Indigenous Law Administrative Law Electoral Law Mootness Band Council Election Validity Justiciability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE PELICAN LAKE BAND APPEAL BOARD

Appellant

HARVEY ABBOTT

Respondent

EDWARD BILL

Respondent

JIMMY BILL

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal Dismissed for Mootness (final Disposition)

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was moot
  2. 2 Whether the court should dismiss the appeal for mootness due to a subsequent election rendering the issue non‑justiciable

Ratio Decidendi

Because the 2001 band council's term expired and a new election occurred, the dispute no longer presented a live controversy; the appeal was therefore dismissed as moot and not entertained.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for mootness

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed as moot.
  • There shall be no costs.