In re Atkinson / National Trust v. Public Trustee
The Court of Appeal properly directed further evidence and, having considered the fuller record, had jurisdiction to set aside the surrogate court judge's allowance and determine the appropriate compensation; on the facts the Court of Appeal's reduction of the allowance to $149,124.57 was appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [1953] 2 SCR 41
- Parties
- Appellant / Executor: National Trust Company Limited, Executor of the Estate of Joseph E. Atkinson; Respondent: The Public Trustee; Respondent: The Trustees of the Atkinson Foundation; Respondent: The Official Guardian
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 June 1953
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario on Passing of Accounts of Executor
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal's reduction of executor's allowance to $149,124.57 affirmed; costs payable out of estate with appellant's costs as between solicitor and client.
- Legal Topics
- Executor Compensation, Passing Accounts, Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal, Assessment of Executor Fees, Interpretation of Surrogate Courts Act and Trustee Act
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Trust Company Limited, Executor of the Estate of Joseph E. Atkinson
Appellant / Executor
The Public Trustee
Respondent
The Trustees of the Atkinson Foundation
Respondent
The Official Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario on Passing of Accounts of Executor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal may set aside a surrogate court judge's allowance for executor compensation absent an error in principle by the surrogate judge
- 2 Proper method and principles for assessing executor compensation on passing accounts
- 3 Scope of s.31(1) of the Surrogate Courts Act and s.60(3) of the Trustee Act and the power to direct further evidence under the Judicature Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal properly directed further evidence and, having considered the fuller record, had jurisdiction to set aside the surrogate court judge's allowance and determine the appropriate compensation; on the facts the Court of Appeal's reduction of the allowance to $149,124.57 was appropriate and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal's reduction of executor's allowance to $149,124.57 affirmed; costs payable out of estate with appellant's costs as between solicitor and client.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Allowance reduced to $149,124.57
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment