R. v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police
The appeal is dismissed because the Court of Appeal agreed with and endorsed the decisions of Chief Justice Kennedy and Judge Ross, finding no basis to overturn those decisions.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2001 NSCA 30
- Parties
- Appellant: The Royal Canadian Mounted Police; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Dismissed, Endorsement of Lower Court Decisions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal should overturn the decisions of Chief Justice Kennedy and Judge Ross
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the Court of Appeal agreed with and endorsed the decisions of Chief Justice Kennedy and Judge Ross, finding no basis to overturn those decisions.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Court Court of Appeal Date 2001-02-07 Citation 2001 NSCA 30 Docket CAC 166523 Judge/Registrar/Adjudicator Flinn, Edward J. (Honourable Justice); Roscoe, Elizabeth A. (Honourable Justice) (CA); Chipman, David (Honourable Justice) Document Type Decision Decision Content Date: 20010207 Docket: CAC 166523 NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL [Cite as: R. v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police, 2001 NSCA 30] Roscoe, Chipman and Flinn, JJ.A. BETWEEN: THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE Appellant - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent __________________________________________________________________ REASONS FOR JUDGMENT __________________________________________________________________ Counsel: Joel E. Pink, Q.C. for the Appellant Duncan R. Beveridge, Q.C. for the Respondent Appeal Heard: February 7, 2001 Judgment Delivered: February 7, 2001 THE COURT: The appeal is dismissed as per oral reasons for judgment of Roscoe, J.A.; Chipman and Flinn, JJ.A. ROSCOE, J.A.: (Orally) [1] The appeal is dismissed. We agree with and endorse the decisions of Chief Justice Kennedy and Judge Ross. Roscoe, J.A. Concurred in: Chipman, J.A. Flinn, J.A.