R. v. Turner
Because the Crown did not disprove an element of the s.35 defence beyond a reasonable doubt, and on the evidence the accused was in peaceable possession, reasonably believed the complainant was about to steal his property, acted to prevent the taking, and used only a minimal, reasonable tap, the defence of property applied and the Crown failed to prove assault beyond a reasonable doubt; accused acquitted.
- Citation
- 2024 NSPC 3
- Parties
- Crown: His Majesty the King; Defendant: Thomas Charles Turner
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Assault (summary) / Trial Judgment (provincial Court)
- Outcome
- Acquitted — charge not proven beyond a reasonable doubt
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Defence of Property, Credibility Assessment, Air of Reality Test, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty the King
Crown
Thomas Charles Turner
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Assault (summary) / Trial Judgment (provincial Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Nature of the touching (tap versus grab)
- 2 Whether defence of property under s.35 Criminal Code has an air of reality
- 3 Whether accused believed on reasonable grounds property was about to be taken
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Crown did not disprove an element of the s.35 defence beyond a reasonable doubt, and on the evidence the accused was in peaceable possession, reasonably believed the complainant was about to steal his property, acted to prevent the taking, and used only a minimal, reasonable tap, the defence of property applied and the Crown failed to prove assault beyond a reasonable doubt; accused acquitted.
Court Disposition
Acquitted — charge not proven beyond a reasonable doubt
Orders
- Accused acquitted of assault contrary to s.266 Criminal Code; judgment accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment