Bronson v. Hewitt
Leave to seek repayment from Jennifer Lewis Browning and Julie Anne Lewis was refused because the plaintiffs failed to plead any claim against them and it would be manifestly unjust and prejudicial to permit new relief against necessary parties after trial; the court reserved decision on other remedies pending full argument at the scheduled hearing.
- Citation
- 2010 BCSC 1638
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Thomas E. Bronson; Plaintiff: J. Tom Bronson; Plaintiff: Lee B. Lewis; Plaintiff: Virginia L. Shaffer; Plaintiff: H. Davis Lewis, Jr.; Plaintiff: Harold D. Lewis, Sr.; Defendant: Howard H. Hewitt; Defendant: A. Eugene Lewis; Defendant: Jennifer Lewis Browning; Defendant: Julie Anne Lewis; Defendant: William David Tompkins, Trustee of the Graham River Trust; Defendant: Graham River Outfitters Ltd.; Defendant: Margaret H. Mason; Defendant: Bull Housser & Tupper; Defendant: Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP; Third Party: Thomas E. Bronson
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Action – Breach of Trust and Remedies / Post‑judgment Application for Leave to Make Additional Submissions and Reconsideration; Leave Refused as to Two Defendants; Remaining Issues Reserved for Hearing
- Outcome
- Application partially dismissed and partially reserved: leave to seek repayment from Jennifer Lewis Browning and Julie Anne Lewis dismissed; remaining issues on remedies reserved for full argument at upcoming hearing; costs awarded to Jennifer and Julie of the application.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Remedies, Reconsideration/leave to Reopen, Distribution of Trust Assets, Election of Remedies, Necessary Parties, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas E. Bronson
Plaintiff
J. Tom Bronson
Plaintiff
Lee B. Lewis
Plaintiff
Virginia L. Shaffer
Plaintiff
H. Davis Lewis, Jr.
Plaintiff
Harold D. Lewis, Sr.
Plaintiff
Howard H. Hewitt
Defendant
A. Eugene Lewis
Defendant
Jennifer Lewis Browning
Defendant
Julie Anne Lewis
Defendant
William David Tompkins, Trustee of the Graham River Trust
Defendant
Graham River Outfitters Ltd.
Defendant
Margaret H. Mason
Defendant
Bull Housser & Tupper
Defendant
Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP
Defendant
Thomas E. Bronson
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Trust Action – Breach of Trust and Remedies / Post‑judgment Application for Leave to Make Additional Submissions and Reconsideration; Leave Refused as to Two Defendants; Remaining Issues Reserved for Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants Jennifer Lewis Browning and Julie Anne Lewis must refund March 2004 distribution to the Big Nine Trust
- 2 Whether the judgment against Howard H. Hewitt and A. Eugene Lewis should be increased to the full shortfall of the sale ($486,776–$653,456 CAD)
- 3 Whether judgment should be payable to the Big Nine Trust rather than individual beneficiaries
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to seek repayment from Jennifer Lewis Browning and Julie Anne Lewis was refused because the plaintiffs failed to plead any claim against them and it would be manifestly unjust and prejudicial to permit new relief against necessary parties after trial; the court reserved decision on other remedies pending full argument at the scheduled hearing.
Court Disposition
Application partially dismissed and partially reserved: leave to seek repayment from Jennifer Lewis Browning and Julie Anne Lewis dismissed; remaining issues on remedies reserved for full argument at upcoming hearing; costs awarded to Jennifer and Julie of the application.
Orders
- Application for leave to seek relief against Jennifer Lewis Browning and Julie Anne Lewis dismissed
- Jennifer Lewis Browning and Julie Anne Lewis entitled to costs of the application in any event of the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment