Bronson v. Hewitt
The Big Nine Trust ceased to exist as of March 2004 when the trustee Howard distributed the trust property and the trust was without assets; because the trust had no property Harold never became trustee and his subsequent purported appointment of Tommy under s.27 TA is ineffective; no new trustees are required or appointed at this time; Howard must pass his accounts but the passing is stayed until 90 days after exhaustion of all appeals or by agreement of the parties; no order removing Howard is necessary because the trust assets have been distributed.
- Citation
- 2011 BCSC 1115
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Thomas E. Bronson; Plaintiff: J. Tom Bronson; Plaintiff: Lee. B. Lewis; Plaintiff: Virginia L. Shaffer; Plaintiff: H. Davis Lewis, Jr.; Plaintiff: Harold D. Lewis, Sr.; Defendant: Howard H. Hewitt; Defendant: A. Eugene Lewis; Defendant: Jennifer Lewis Browning; Defendant: Julie Anne Lewis; Defendant: William David Tompkins, Trustee of the Graham River Trust; Defendant: Graham River Outfitters Ltd.; Defendant: Margaret H. Mason; Defendant: Bull, Housser & Tupper; Defendant: Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP; Third Party: Thomas E. Bronson
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Litigation / Post Trial Remedies/further Reasons
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Termination of Trust, Appointment of Trustees, Passing of Accounts, Constructive Trust, Tracing, Damages, Remedies, Distribution of Trust Property
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas E. Bronson
Plaintiff
J. Tom Bronson
Plaintiff
Lee. B. Lewis
Plaintiff
Virginia L. Shaffer
Plaintiff
H. Davis Lewis, Jr.
Plaintiff
Harold D. Lewis, Sr.
Plaintiff
Howard H. Hewitt
Defendant
A. Eugene Lewis
Defendant
Jennifer Lewis Browning
Defendant
Julie Anne Lewis
Defendant
William David Tompkins, Trustee of the Graham River Trust
Defendant
Graham River Outfitters Ltd.
Defendant
Margaret H. Mason
Defendant
Bull, Housser & Tupper
Defendant
Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP
Defendant
Thomas E. Bronson
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Trust Litigation / Post Trial Remedies/further Reasons
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the Big Nine Trust (BNT) continues to exist
- 2 whether new or replacement trustees should be appointed (Harold, Tommy, others)
- 3 whether trustee Howard should be removed and must pass his accounts
Ratio Decidendi
The Big Nine Trust ceased to exist as of March 2004 when the trustee Howard distributed the trust property and the trust was without assets; because the trust had no property Harold never became trustee and his subsequent purported appointment of Tommy under s.27 TA is ineffective; no new trustees are required or appointed at this time; Howard must pass his accounts but the passing is stayed until 90 days after exhaustion of all appeals or by agreement of the parties; no order removing Howard is necessary because the trust assets have been distributed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment