Canada Judgment

Federal Court

Tiller v. Canada

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court approved the Settlement and Supplemental Agreement as fair, reasonable and in the best interests of Class Members, incorporated the agreements into the Order, appointed Deloitte LLP as Administrator and Louise Otis as Assessor, approved the notice forms and distribution plan (with up to $250,000 payable by the Defendant for distribution), ordered dismissal of the action with full release of Released Claims as against Releasees for Class Members who did not opt out by the opt-out deadline, imposed protections against compulsion and production of materials obtained by the Administrator/Assessor, and retained continuing jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement.

Court disposition

Settlement approved; Supplemental Agreement approved; action dismissed; release granted; Court retains continuing jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Settlement Agreement dated June 21, 2019 and Supplemental Agreement dated October 1, 2019 are approved and incorporated into the Order
  • The Settlement is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of Class Members and is approved
  • The Supplemental Agreement is approved and forms part of the Settlement Agreement
  • Long form and short form Notices of Settlement Approval are approved in the forms attached as Schedules C and D and will be available in English and French
  • KCC LCC and RicePoint Administration Inc. will distribute the Notice of Settlement Approval substantially in the manner set out in the Notice Plan (Schedule E)
  • Defendant will pay the cost of distributing the Notice of Settlement Approval in accordance with the Notice Plan up to a maximum of $250,000 CAD
  • Deloitte LLP is appointed as the Settlement Administrator and its duties under the Settlement Agreement and Supplemental Agreement are binding
  • The Administrator will make payments to Claimants or their counsel in accordance with directions provided
  • Defendant will pay the fees, disbursements and other costs of the Administrator, including pre-Approval Date work
  • The Honourable Louise Otis is appointed as the Settlement Assessor and her duties under the Settlement Agreement and Supplemental Agreement are binding
  • Defendant will pay the fees, disbursements and other costs of the Assessor, including pre-Approval Date work
  • The Defendant and the RCMP will release to the Assessor and Administrator information and documents required by them or the Settlement Agreement and by the Court's July 5, 2019 Order
  • Assessor and Administrator and their staff cannot be compelled to be witnesses in proceedings concerning information obtained by reason of the Settlement or claims process
  • No documents received by the Assessor or Administrator by reason of the Settlement or claims process are producible in any proceeding
  • No person may bring an action or proceeding against the Administrator or Assessor in relation to the Settlement or its administration except with leave of the Court on notice to affected parties
  • The action against the Defendant is dismissed and the Releasees are forever released from the Released Claims in full and final satisfaction for Class Members who have not opted out by the Opt Out Period expiry (September 13, 2019)
  • Class Members who have not opted out are barred from making or continuing claims or proceedings arising from the Released Claims, including human rights or workers' compensation claims, against Releasees or parties who may seek contribution or indemnity from Releasees
  • Defendant to prepare and provide to the Assessor and Administrator a list of Primary Class Members previously paid or previously claiming compensation in prior civil claims, grievances or harassment complaints for the purpose of determining entitlement
  • The Court will retain continuing jurisdiction over the Settlement and its implementation, interpretation and enforcement and the Parties will report to the Court at least every six months unless otherwise ordered
  • Each Party will bear their own costs of this application

02

Material facts

Parties

Cheryl Tiller

Representative Plaintiff

Mary-Ellen Copland

Representative Plaintiff

Dayna Roach

Representative Plaintiff

Her Majesty the Queen

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Notice Distribution Cap: CAD 250,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Class Proceeding / Settlement Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Representative Plaintiffs, on consent, asked the Court to approve the June 21, 2019 Settlement and October 1, 2019 Supplemental Agreement as fair, reasonable and in the best interests of Class Members; to approve notices and the notice distribution plan; to appoint Deloitte LLP as Administrator and Louise Otis as Assessor; to authorize payment by the Defendant of all amounts required by the Settlement including notice distribution up to $250,000 and Administrator/Assessor fees; and to dismiss the action with full release of Released Claims subject to opt-outs.
Respondent
Defendant consented to the Settlement and its terms, including payment obligations and appointments, and did not oppose approval of the Settlement, notices, distribution plan, or dismissal and releases; there was no contested opposition recorded.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 and class action jurisprudence

    Court must approve a class settlement as fair, reasonable and in the best interests of class members before it becomes binding

  2. 02

    Settlement Agreement and common law on class actions

    Settlement agreements and ancillary agreements can be incorporated into court orders and bound upon class members who do not timely opt out

  3. 03

    Federal Court practice and the Settlement Agreement

    Court may retain continuing jurisdiction to supervise implementation, interpretation and enforcement of a settlement

  4. 04

    Settlement Agreement and court order provisions

    Protections may be ordered for administrators/assessors including immunity from compulsion to testify and restriction on production of documents obtained through the claims process

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court approved the Settlement and Supplemental Agreement as fair, reasonable and in the best interests of Class Members, incorporated the agreements into the Order, appointed Deloitte LLP as Administrator and Louise Otis as Assessor, approved the notice forms and distribution plan (with up to $250,000 payable by the Defendant for distribution), ordered dismissal of the action with full release of Released Claims as against Releasees for Class Members who did not opt out by the opt-out deadline, imposed protections against compulsion and production of materials obtained by the Administrator/Assessor, and retained continuing jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement.

Obiter and limits

  • Counsel fees were excluded from this approval and left to a separate decision and order
  • Parties may make non-substantive amendments to the Settlement Agreement subject to Court approval
  • Publishing of the Notice of Settlement Approval to commence within seven days of the Implementation Date

Court disposition

Settlement approved; Supplemental Agreement approved; action dismissed; release granted; Court retains continuing jurisdiction.

  • Settlement Agreement dated June 21, 2019 and Supplemental Agreement dated October 1, 2019 are approved and incorporated into the Order
  • The Settlement is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of Class Members and is approved
  • The Supplemental Agreement is approved and forms part of the Settlement Agreement
  • Long form and short form Notices of Settlement Approval are approved in the forms attached as Schedules C and D and will be available in English and French
  • KCC LCC and RicePoint Administration Inc. will distribute the Notice of Settlement Approval substantially in the manner set out in the Notice Plan (Schedule E)
  • Defendant will pay the cost of distributing the Notice of Settlement Approval in accordance with the Notice Plan up to a maximum of $250,000 CAD
  • Deloitte LLP is appointed as the Settlement Administrator and its duties under the Settlement Agreement and Supplemental Agreement are binding
  • The Administrator will make payments to Claimants or their counsel in accordance with directions provided
  • Defendant will pay the fees, disbursements and other costs of the Administrator, including pre-Approval Date work
  • The Honourable Louise Otis is appointed as the Settlement Assessor and her duties under the Settlement Agreement and Supplemental Agreement are binding
  • Defendant will pay the fees, disbursements and other costs of the Assessor, including pre-Approval Date work
  • The Defendant and the RCMP will release to the Assessor and Administrator information and documents required by them or the Settlement Agreement and by the Court's July 5, 2019 Order
  • Assessor and Administrator and their staff cannot be compelled to be witnesses in proceedings concerning information obtained by reason of the Settlement or claims process
  • No documents received by the Assessor or Administrator by reason of the Settlement or claims process are producible in any proceeding
  • No person may bring an action or proceeding against the Administrator or Assessor in relation to the Settlement or its administration except with leave of the Court on notice to affected parties
  • The action against the Defendant is dismissed and the Releasees are forever released from the Released Claims in full and final satisfaction for Class Members who have not opted out by the Opt Out Period expiry (September 13, 2019)
  • Class Members who have not opted out are barred from making or continuing claims or proceedings arising from the Released Claims, including human rights or workers' compensation claims, against Releasees or parties who may seek contribution or indemnity from Releasees
  • Defendant to prepare and provide to the Assessor and Administrator a list of Primary Class Members previously paid or previously claiming compensation in prior civil claims, grievances or harassment complaints for the purpose of determining entitlement
  • The Court will retain continuing jurisdiction over the Settlement and its implementation, interpretation and enforcement and the Parties will report to the Court at least every six months unless otherwise ordered
  • Each Party will bear their own costs of this application

Source and reliance status

Federal Court · 10 March 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Federal Court

Judgment· 10 March 2020

2020 FC 320

Tiller v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2020-03-10 Neutral citation 2020 FC 320 File numbers T-1673-17 Decision Content Date: 20200310 Docket: T-1673-17 Citation: 2020 FC 320 Ottawa, Ontario, March 10, 2020 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan

CLASS PROCEEDING BETWEEN: CHERYL TILLER, MARY-ELLEN COPLAND

AND DAYNA ROACH Plaintiffs and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant

ORDER (Settlement Approval) WHEREAS this motion was made by the Representative Plaintiffs, on consent, pursuant to the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106; AND WHEREAS the Parties entered into a settlement agreement dated June 21, 2019, and a supplemental agreement dated October 1, 2019, in respect of the Representative Plaintiffs’ claims against the Defendant; AND WHEREAS this motion was heard on October 17, 2019; AND UPON READING the motion record of the Representative Plaintiffs; THIS COURT ORDERS that: Settlement Approval The settlement of this action as set out in the settlement agreement dated June 21, 2019 (collectively with its recitals, schedules and appendices the “Settlement” or “Settlement Agreement”), attached as Schedule A, is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of Class Members and is approved. Counsel fees are not included in this approval and are the matter of a separate decision and order. The Supplemental Agreement containing the terms of appointment of the Administrator and the Assessor (the “Supplemental Agreement), attached as Schedule B, forms part of the Settlement Agreement, and is approved. The Settlement Agreement, including the Supplemental Agreement, is incorporated by reference into this Order and the definitions set out in the Settlement Agreement apply to this Order. The Settlement and this Order are binding on the Parties and on every Class

Member, including persons under disability, unless they opted out or are deemed to have opted out of this class proceeding on or before the expiry of the Opt Out Period, being September 13, 2019. The Defendant will pay all amounts required by the Settlement Agreement and this Order. The Parties to the Settlement may, subject to Court approval, make non-substantive amendments to the Settlement Agreement, provided that each Party to the Settlement Agreement agrees in writing to any such amendments. Notice of Settlement Approval The long form Notice of Settlement Approval is approved substantially in the same form and content attached as Schedule C. It will be available in both English and French. The short form Notice of Settlement Approval is approved substantially in the same form and content attached as Schedule D. It will be available in both English and French. KCC LCC and RicePoint Administration Inc. will distribute the Notice of Settlement Approval substantially in the manner set out in the Notice Plan attached as Schedule E. The Defendant will pay KCC LCC and RicePoint Administration Inc. the cost of distributing the Notice of Settlement Approval in accordance with the Notice Plan up to a maximum of $250,000. Publishing of the Notice of Settlement Approval will commence within seven (7) days of the Implementation Date. Appointment of Administrator and Assessor Deloitte

LLP is appointed as the Settlement’s Administrator pursuant to Section 6.041 of the Settlement Agreement. The Administrator’s duties and obligations as set out in the Settlement Agreement, including the Supplemental Agreement, and this Order are binding on the Administrator. The Administrator will make payments to Claimants as required under the Settlement Agreement or, where the Claimant has provided the Administrator with a direction to pay her counsel or law firm in trust, to that counsel or law firm. The Defendant will pay the fees, disbursements, and other costs of the Administrator in accordance with Section 6.06 of the Settlement Agreement and the Supplemental Agreement, including work undertaken for these purposes prior to the Approval Date. The Honourable Louise Otis is appointed as the Settlement’s Assessor, pursuant to Section 6.01 of the Settlement Agreement. The Assessor’s duties and obligations as set out in the Settlement Agreement, including the Supplemental Agreement, and this Order are binding on the Assessor. The Defendant will pay the fees, disbursements, and other costs of the Assessor in accordance with Section 6.06 of the Settlement Agreement and the Supplemental Agreement, including work undertaken for these purposes prior to the Approval Date. The Defendant and the RCMP will release to the Assessor and to the Administrator information and documents

required by them or otherwise required by the Settlement Agreement or the Settlement claims process, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, as well as the information required by this Court’s July 5, 2019 Order in this matter. Neither the Assessor nor the Administrator nor their employees, agents, partners or associates can be compelled to be a witness in any civil or criminal proceeding, administrative proceeding, grievance or arbitration where the information sought relates, directly or indirectly, to information obtained by the Assessor or the Administrator by reason of the Settlement or the Settlement claims process. No documents received by the Assessor or the Administrator by reason of the Settlement or the Settlement claims process, whether received directly or indirectly, are producible in any civil or criminal proceeding, administrative proceeding, grievance or arbitration. No person may bring an action or take any proceeding against the Administrator or the Assessor or their employees, agents, partners, associates or successors for any matter in any way relating to the Settlement and its implementation and administration, except with leave of this Court on notice to all affected parties. Dismissal and Release The action against the Defendant is dismissed. The obligations assumed by the Defendant under the Settlement Agreement are in full and final

satisfaction of all Released Claims against the Releasees, and the Releasees are forever and absolutely released from the Released Claims, separately and severally, by Class Members, including persons under disability, who have not opted out and are not deemed to have opted out of this class proceeding prior to the expiration of the Opt Out Period. Class Members, including persons under disability, who have not opted out and who are not deemed to have opted out of this class proceeding prior to the expiration of the Opt Out Period are barred from making any claim or taking or continuing any proceeding, including a Canadian Human Right Commission complaint or a claim pursuant to a provincial or territorial workers’ compensation scheme, seeking compensation or other relief arising from or in any way related to the Released Claims against any Releasees or any other person, corporation or entity that might claim damages, contribution, indemnity or other relief from a Releasee pursuant to the provisions of the Negligence Act, RSBC 1996, c 333 or its counterparts in other jurisdictions, the Police Act, RSBC 1996, c 367 or its counterparts in other jurisdictions, the common law, Quebec civil law or any statutory liability for any relief whatsoever, including relief of a monetary, declaratory or injunctive nature. Class Members who are awarded compensation under this settlement are

barred from making a claim or taking or continuing any type of proceeding arising out of, or relating to, any harassment or discrimination in the workplace by any Regular Member, Special Constable, Cadet, Auxiliary Constable, Special Constable Member, Reserve Member, Civilian Member, Public Service Employee, or Temporary Civilian Employee, working within the RCMP, male or female. Prior Claims for Compensation For the purpose of facilitating the determination of a Claimant’s entitlement to compensation, the Defendant is to prepare and provide to the Assessor and to Deloitte LLP a list of Primary Class Members who have been paid by Canada further to a civil claim, grievance or harassment complaint, including a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, or who have had a prior civil claim, grievance or harassment complaint in which compensation was claimed and in which Canada was a party, including a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, otherwise resolved in respect of gender or sexual orientation based harassment or discrimination in an RCMP controlled workplace during the Class Period. Continuing Jurisdiction This Court will retain continuing jurisdiction over the Settlement and its implementation, interpretation and enforcement and the Parties will report to the Court from time to time as directed by the Court but not less than every six (6) months unless otherwise ordered. The Parties will seek judgments or orders from the Court in such form as is necessary to implement and enforce the provisions of the Settlement Agreement and to supervise the ongoing performance of the Settlement Agreement. Costs Each Party will bear their own costs of this application. blank “Michael L. Phelan” blank Judge

SCHEDULE A SCHEDULE B – APPENDIX 1

SCHEDULE B

SCHEDULE C

SCHEDULE D

SCHEDULE E

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Negligence Act, RSBC 1996, c 333

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Police Act, RSBC 1996, c 367

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.