Bonello v. Gores Landing Marina (1986) Limited
The appeal is dismissed because the third party participants did not owe a prima facie duty of care to the plaintiff: the Childs exceptions for imposing a positive duty to act were not met (no creation or control of risk, no special supervisory relationship, no commercial/public function), and foreseeability did not reach the level required to make the injury a natural and probable result of the participants' conduct; accordingly summary dismissal of the Third Party Claim was justified and costs were awarded.
- Citation
- 2019 ONCA 127
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Timothy Bonello; Plaintiff: Ted Bonello; Plaintiff: Anne Cutajar Wagner; Plaintiff: Andrew Bonello; Plaintiff: Mark Bonello; Defendant (appellant): Gores Landing Marina (1986) Limited; Defendant (appellant): Joseph Davies Sr.; Defendant (appellant): Murray E. Carslake; Defendant (appellant): Joseph Davies Jr. (Joey Davies); Third Party (respondent): Chris Kane; Third Party (respondent): Chris Ryan; Third Party (respondent): Anthony Cook; Third Party (respondent): Gabe Mansueto; Third Party (respondent): Gerald Chestnut; Third Party (respondent): Jeff Jaglel; Third Party (respondent): Frank Buttigieg; Third Party (respondent): Dan Rule; Third Party (respondent): Mike Buttigieg
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Third Party Claim, Duty of Care, Foreseeability, Proximity, Issue Estoppel, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timothy Bonello
Plaintiff
Ted Bonello
Plaintiff
Anne Cutajar Wagner
Plaintiff
Andrew Bonello
Plaintiff
Mark Bonello
Plaintiff
Gores Landing Marina (1986) Limited
Defendant (appellant)
Joseph Davies Sr.
Defendant (appellant)
Murray E. Carslake
Defendant (appellant)
Joseph Davies Jr. (Joey Davies)
Defendant (appellant)
Chris Kane
Third Party (respondent)
Chris Ryan
Third Party (respondent)
Anthony Cook
Third Party (respondent)
Gabe Mansueto
Third Party (respondent)
Gerald Chestnut
Third Party (respondent)
Jeff Jaglel
Third Party (respondent)
Frank Buttigieg
Third Party (respondent)
Dan Rule
Third Party (respondent)
Mike Buttigieg
Third Party (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Existence of a duty of care owed by third party participants
- 2 Foreseeability of the harm from a looped rope in a tug-of-war
- 3 Proximity and special relationship requirements for positive duty to act
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the third party participants did not owe a prima facie duty of care to the plaintiff: the Childs exceptions for imposing a positive duty to act were not met (no creation or control of risk, no special supervisory relationship, no commercial/public function), and foreseeability did not reach the level required to make the injury a natural and probable result of the participants' conduct; accordingly summary dismissal of the Third Party Claim was justified and costs were awarded.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Third Party Claim dismissed (upheld)
- Respondent third parties entitled to costs of the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment