Kamm v Harper

Kamm v Harper

Claim dismissed because it was filed outside the two‑year limitation period (claim discovered by September 20, 2019); alternatively, claimant failed to prove a binding contract or that defendant moved or secured the boat, failed to prove breach or causation, and failed to prove quantum of damages.

Citation
2022 NSSM 10
Parties
Claimant: John Kamm; Defendant: Tommy Harper
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 February 2022
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Decision
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Negligence, Limitation Period (discovery Rule), Causation, Damages Assessment
Source Language
English
Contract Law Tort (negligence) Limitation of Actions Maritime Property Breach of Contract Negligence Limitation Period (discovery Rule) Causation +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kamm

Claimant

Tommy Harper

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claim was time‑barred under the Limitation of Actions Act
  2. 2 Whether a binding contract was formed obliging the defendant to secure the claimant's boat
  3. 3 Whether the defendant was negligent and caused the damage to the boat

Ratio Decidendi

Claim dismissed because it was filed outside the two‑year limitation period (claim discovered by September 20, 2019); alternatively, claimant failed to prove a binding contract or that defendant moved or secured the boat, failed to prove breach or causation, and failed to prove quantum of damages.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim dismissed