R. v. Mavreas
Leave to appeal was denied because the proposed appeal was essentially fact driven, raised no issue of law of general importance, and the grounds were not sufficiently strong to warrant leave.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2010 ONCA 358
- Parties
- Appellant: Tommy Mavreas; Respondent: Her Majesty The Queen
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Leave to Appeal (denied)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal denied
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Summary Conviction Appeal, Factual Issues Vs Question of Law
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tommy Mavreas
Appellant
Her Majesty The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Leave to Appeal (denied)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the proposed appeal raises an issue of law of general importance
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was denied because the proposed appeal was essentially fact driven, raised no issue of law of general importance, and the grounds were not sufficiently strong to warrant leave.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal denied
Orders
- Leave to appeal is denied
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Mavreas Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2010-05-18 Neutral citation 2010 ONCA 358 Docket numbers C49790 Judges Moldaver, Michael James; LaForme, Harry Smith; Rouleau, Paul S. Subject Criminal Decision Content CITATION: R. v. Mavreas, 2010 ONCA 358 DATE: 20100514 DOCKET: C49790 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Moldaver, LaForme and Rouleau JJ.A. BETWEEN: Her Majesty The Queen Respondent and Tommy Mavreas Appellant Brian Snell, for the appellant Grace Choi, for the respondent Heard and endorsed: May 13, 2010 On appeal from the order dated December 1, 2008, of Justice Patrick W. Dunn of the Superior Court of Justice, sitting as a Summary Conviction Appeal Judge, dismissing the appellant’s appeal from the conviction by Justice Paul R. Currie of the Ontario Court of Justice, dated September 26, 2007. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] The proposed appeal is essentially fact driven. Counsel concedes that it raises no issue of law of general importance and we are not persuaded the grounds of appeal are sufficiently strong to warrant leave. [2] Accordingly, leave to appeal is denied.