Tractor Supply Co. of Texas v. TSC Stores L.P.

Tractor Supply Co. of Texas v. TSC Stores L.P.

The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because the Motions Judge correctly applied the governing tests (White and, alternatively, RJR‑MacDonald), properly concluded the appellants failed to show that a stay was in the interest of justice under s.50, and no palpable and overriding error or error of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 FCA 46
Parties
Appellant: Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP; Appellant: Tractor Supply Company; Respondent: TSC Stores L.P.
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
7 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal From Order Refusing Stay of Trade Marks Opposition Board Proceedings
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Abstention, Interlocutory Relief, Judicial Review
Source Language
en
Trade Mark Law Civil Procedure Administrative Law Federal Courts Practice Stay of Proceedings Abstention Interlocutory Relief Judicial Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP

Appellant

Tractor Supply Company

Appellant

TSC Stores L.P.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal From Order Refusing Stay of Trade Marks Opposition Board Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the Trade-marks Opposition Board proceedings should be stayed pending final disposition of a related Federal Court action
  2. 2 Whether the Motions Judge erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in refusing the stay
  3. 3 Application of the 'interest of justice' test under s.50 of the Federal Courts Act and relevant stay criteria

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because the Motions Judge correctly applied the governing tests (White and, alternatively, RJR‑MacDonald), properly concluded the appellants failed to show that a stay was in the interest of justice under s.50, and no palpable and overriding error or error of principle was demonstrated on appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs awarded to respondent