R. v. Reddick
Given the unique facts — a single dilaudid pill likely obtained by prescription, trafficked in a one‑off non‑commercial exchange, the offender's serious permanent injuries, disability and lack of prior drug convictions — the court departed from the usual two‑year benchmark for trafficking and imposed a 16 month...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2013 NSSC 70
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Alexander John Reddick
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Drug Trafficking / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to 16 months imprisonment in the Correctional Centre; ancillary orders granted; no victim fine surcharge imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking, Controlled Drugs and Substances Act S.5(1), Sentencing Principles, Proportionality, Fifield Categories, Ancillary Orders
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Alexander John Reddick
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Drug Trafficking / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for trafficking a single dilaudid pill
- 2 Whether the pill was lawfully obtained by prescription
- 3 Applicability of appellate sentencing ranges for trafficking and Fifield categories
Ratio Decidendi
Given the unique facts — a single dilaudid pill likely obtained by prescription, trafficked in a one‑off non‑commercial exchange, the offender's serious permanent injuries, disability and lack of prior drug convictions — the court departed from the usual two‑year benchmark for trafficking and imposed a 16 month custodial sentence in the Correctional Centre while still imposing denunciation and deterrence objectives and granting ancillary orders.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to 16 months imprisonment in the Correctional Centre; ancillary orders granted; no victim fine surcharge imposed.
Orders
- 16 months imprisonment in the Correctional Centre
- Weapons prohibition order under s.109 of the Criminal Code for ten years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment