R. v. Moore

R. v. Moore

The trial judge’s global sentence was appropriate given the offender’s record and offence characteristics, but the judge erred by failing to credit pre-sentence custody; accordingly the Court allowed the appeal in part and reduced the sentence on count #6 to 22 months imprisonment.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 ONCA 413
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty The Queen; Appellant: Trevor Moore
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
31 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence (court of Appeal Decision)
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; leave to appeal sentence granted; sentence on count #6 reduced to 22 months imprisonment.
Legal Topics
Pre Sentence Custody Credit, Global Sentence, Probation, Drug Offences, Leave to Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Appeal Pre Sentence Custody Credit Global Sentence Probation Drug Offences Leave to Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty The Queen

Respondent

Trevor Moore

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence (court of Appeal Decision)

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in failing to credit pre-sentence custody
  2. 2 Whether the global sentence was demonstrably unfit or otherwise erroneous
  3. 3 Whether leave to appeal sentence should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge’s global sentence was appropriate given the offender’s record and offence characteristics, but the judge erred by failing to credit pre-sentence custody; accordingly the Court allowed the appeal in part and reduced the sentence on count #6 to 22 months imprisonment.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; leave to appeal sentence granted; sentence on count #6 reduced to 22 months imprisonment.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal sentence granted
  • Appeal allowed in part