Trevor Nicholas Construction Co. v. Canada

Trevor Nicholas Construction Co. v. Canada

The motions judge did not err: paragraphs 11 and 12 already adequately pleaded the existence and breach of contract A, the proposed additional paragraphs were unnecessary or incomplete and their introduction at this late stage would cause undue delay; therefore leave to amend was properly refused and the appeal is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 428
Parties
Appellant: Trevor Nicholas Construction Co. Limited; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Minister for Public Works
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
13 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal (dismissal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Pleadings, Amendment of Statement of Claim, Leave to Amend, Undue Delay
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contract Law Pleadings Amendment of Statement of Claim Leave to Amend Undue Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Trevor Nicholas Construction Co. Limited

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Minister for Public Works

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal (dismissal)

  1. 1 Whether the motions judge erred in refusing to permit amendments to the statement of claim
  2. 2 Whether proposed paragraphs were unnecessary because existing pleadings adequately alleged the cause of action
  3. 3 Whether proposed paragraphs were incomplete and their introduction at this late stage would cause undue delay

Ratio Decidendi

The motions judge did not err: paragraphs 11 and 12 already adequately pleaded the existence and breach of contract A, the proposed additional paragraphs were unnecessary or incomplete and their introduction at this late stage would cause undue delay; therefore leave to amend was properly refused and the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs