Thomson v. Merchants Bank of Canada
Majority held there was no trust created: the Canadian Agency's receipt of cheques constituted at most agency or a contractual obligation, not a trust in favour of the Merchants Bank; wrongful dishonour of the Agency's cheque did not in equity operate as payment or assignment of the Agency's bank funds to the Merchants Bank; therefore the Merchants Bank had no proprietary claim to the disputed funds and only a personal remedy against the Agency.
- Citation
- (1919) 58 SCR 287
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Edmond D. C. Thomson; Respondent/plaintiff: The Merchants Bank of Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 3 March 1919
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; judgment of the Appellate Division reversed
- Legal Topics
- Trust Formation, Agent's Liability, Dishonoured Cheque, Assignment of Vendor's Interest, Constructive Trust, Equitable Remedies
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edmond D. C. Thomson
Appellant/defendant
The Merchants Bank of Canada
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether funds received by an agent (Canadian Agency) were held on trust for the vendor's assignee (Merchants Bank)
- 2 Whether the receipt and presentation of a cheque by the payee equates in law or equity to payment or an assignment of the drawer's funds
- 3 Whether an agent's undertaking to forward funds creates a trust or only a personal contractual liability to the intended payee
Ratio Decidendi
Majority held there was no trust created: the Canadian Agency's receipt of cheques constituted at most agency or a contractual obligation, not a trust in favour of the Merchants Bank; wrongful dishonour of the Agency's cheque did not in equity operate as payment or assignment of the Agency's bank funds to the Merchants Bank; therefore the Merchants Bank had no proprietary claim to the disputed funds and only a personal remedy against the Agency.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; judgment of the Appellate Division reversed
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Judgment of the Appellate Division and trial judge reversed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment