Citizens Light & Power Co. v. Town of Saint Louis

Citizens Light & Power Co. v. Town of Saint Louis

The confession of judgment entered on the defendant's admission constituted a conclusive judicial admission and res judicata that the contract was valid as to the amount confessed; consequently the defendant could not successfully challenge the contract's validity as to the remaining $591.71, and the concurrent factual findings supporting the plaintiffs' performance stand, so the Superior Court judgment was restored.

Citation
(1904) 34 SCR 495
Parties
Appellant / Plaintiff: Citizens Light and Power Company; Respondent / Defendant: Town of Saint Louis
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
25 March 1904
Procedural Posture
Contract (municipal) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King's Bench (appeal Side)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment of Superior Court restored
Legal Topics
Ultra Vires, Confession of Judgment, Estoppel by Record, Ratification by Statute, Concurrent Findings of Fact, Non‑performance, Vis Major
Source Language
English
Contract Law Municipal Law Civil Procedure Public Law Ultra Vires Confession of Judgment Estoppel by Record Ratification by Statute +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Citizens Light and Power Company

Appellant / Plaintiff

Town of Saint Louis

Respondent / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Contract (municipal) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King's Bench (appeal Side)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a defendant's confession of judgment constitutes a judicial admission and estops the defendant from contesting the underlying contract's validity for the remaining claim
  2. 2 Whether the contract was ultra vires the municipality because authorized by resolution rather than by‑law
  3. 3 Whether alleged non‑performance and outages excused the contractor's liability and justified cancellation

Ratio Decidendi

The confession of judgment entered on the defendant's admission constituted a conclusive judicial admission and res judicata that the contract was valid as to the amount confessed; consequently the defendant could not successfully challenge the contract's validity as to the remaining $591.71, and the concurrent factual findings supporting the plaintiffs' performance stand, so the Superior Court judgment was restored.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment of Superior Court restored

Orders

  • Appeal allowed with costs
  • Judgment of the Superior Court restored in favour of the appellants for the amount claimed less allowed deductions for outages