Used Car Dealers Association of Ontario - Confidentiality Order

Used Car Dealers Association of Ontario - Confidentiality Order

The Tribunal granted the confidentiality order because the documents at issue included confidential financial and competitively sensitive information whose disclosure could cause specific and direct harm; accordingly it authorized designation of Protected Documents, limited disclosure to counsel and the Commissioner...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 Comp Trib 6
Parties
Applicant: Used Car Dealers Association of Ontario; Respondent: Insurance Bureau of Canada
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
2 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave Under Section 103.1 of the Competition Act (leave to Apply Under Sections 75 and 76) / Decision on Confidentiality Order Issued on Written Record at Leave Stage
Outcome
Confidentiality order granted
Legal Topics
Confidentiality Order, Protected Documents, Leave to Apply, Document Designation and Redaction, Return/destruction of Documents
Source Language
en
Competition Law Civil Procedure Evidence Law Confidentiality Law Confidentiality Order Protected Documents Leave to Apply Document Designation and Redaction +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Used Car Dealers Association of Ontario

Applicant

Insurance Bureau of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave Under Section 103.1 of the Competition Act (leave to Apply Under Sections 75 and 76) / Decision on Confidentiality Order Issued on Written Record at Leave Stage

  1. 1 Whether a confidentiality order should be granted under s.103.1
  2. 2 What documents/information qualify as Protected Documents
  3. 3 Who may have access to Protected Documents and on what terms

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal granted the confidentiality order because the documents at issue included confidential financial and competitively sensitive information whose disclosure could cause specific and direct harm; accordingly it authorized designation of Protected Documents, limited disclosure to counsel and the Commissioner and their staff, required redacted public filings and marking of protected evidence at hearing, and ordered return or destruction of Protected Documents at the conclusion of the proceeding subject to limited retention exceptions.

Court Disposition

Confidentiality order granted

Orders

  • Definitions established for Document, Protected Document, Parties and Proceeding.
  • Specified categories of information (financial data, confidential financial information of the Applicant, competitively/commercially sensitive or proprietary information) may cause specific and direct harm and are protectable.