GNR Travel Centre Ltd. v. CWI, Inc.
Affixing a permanently applied sticker/decal bearing a retailers mark to recreational vehicles and to packaging constitutes "use" of the mark in association with goods under s.4(1); GNR proved use in association with the Goods as of the claimed date but failed to prove use in association with the Services as of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2023 FC 2
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: G N R TRAVEL CENTRE LTD.; Respondent/applicant: CWI, INC.
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal Under the Trademarks Act (section 56) From Registrar/opposition Board Decision / Federal Court Judgment on Consolidated Appeals (final)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Use in Association With Goods, Registrability Under S.30(b), Likelihood of Confusion (s.6), Distinctiveness, Evidentiary Burden, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G N R TRAVEL CENTRE LTD.
Applicant/respondent
CWI, INC.
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal Under the Trademarks Act (section 56) From Registrar/opposition Board Decision / Federal Court Judgment on Consolidated Appeals (final)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether affixing a retailers mark (stickers/decals) to third-party manufactured goods constitutes use in association with goods under s.4(1)
- 2 Whether Applicant proved use of the mark in association with services as of claimed date for paragraph 30(b) purposes
- 3 Whether the Opposition Board erred in its likelihood of confusion analysis under s.6(2) and s.6(5)
Ratio Decidendi
Affixing a permanently applied sticker/decal bearing a retailers mark to recreational vehicles and to packaging constitutes "use" of the mark in association with goods under s.4(1); GNR proved use in association with the Goods as of the claimed date but failed to prove use in association with the Services as of the claimed date (Wayback Machine evidence undermined the asserted date), and there was no likelihood of confusion because the marks as a whole differ (GNR element dominant and CAMPING WORLD has low inherent distinctiveness) and long coexistence produced no evidence of actual confusion.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals in T-1561-20 and T-1575-20 dismissed
- Each party to bear its own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment